First of all, the two sets of crews rarely see each other. Both have some terrible looking employees. I'm generalizing, but what I've observed of the west crews is that people with a few years under their belt seem to look and act more professional. The west new hires, which I understand usually tend to be temporary help, seem to be the ones looking ragged. Maybe they are not issuing new west uniforms at this time, but I saw a few that didn't even resemble F/As. Usually a new hire still wants to play the part.
The opposite tends to be true on the east, they have some newer (only a decade lol) F/As that make that wretched thing actually look really good, tailored and crisp. Then you have some senior ones that look like homeless people in torn sweaters. If I had my way the sweaters would be allowed only on the aircraft during rest times, they look terrible. Don't get me started on the guys with no ties or all the F/As that no longer wear wings or epaulettes. I'm embarassed to work for this company too but I still take pride in myself and my profession. From afar people can't see the symbol anyway. Sadly, a lot of us used to take great pride in that logo...
Like I said, both of those are generalizations. I flew with a lady recently with nearly 30 years who looked every bit a classic stewardess, just her presentation, demeanor and the way she wore that uniform exuded class. In fact, we could all take a hint from our number one F/A who is as much a class act today as she was when she started half a century ago.
And Jetsetter, maybe you should forward the definition of 'uniform' and 'uniformity' to your buddies Travis and Kevin. 80 different colors and styles do not make a uniform, they make a chintzy QVC wardrobe. Please inform them that a blazer over a polo is not "business" as hilariously claimed in the cringeworthy video we had to watch in Envoy training. Perhaps one throws a blazer on for the spring fling at the trailer court, but it is certainly not "business" attire.