Looks like I have to bring Hollerbach's email out:
'There was one mention of a snapback in the negotiations surrounding LOA 93 and that was on day 1, the first pass of the pilots' proposal to the Company where we addressed snapback to previous rates. The Company unequivocally rejected the notion as the financial situation was so dire (and it was dire) that to achieve financing, a projected snapback would not be received favorably by lenders or investors."
and
"There is no snapback, no term on rates, except that the contract becomes amendable on December 31st 2009. To tell you that USAPA doesn't have a chance in this grievance is an understatement... The problem at hand is that there is nothing to support the union position from a practical standpoint. Trust me, I would love a snap back to previous rates, but I won't commit perjury to get there when it isn't the truth. This particular arbitration will, in my view, be the shortest in history and it won't be favorable for the pilot group."
Man, for a pilot who would benefit greatly from a positive outcome of LOA 93, you sure have a negative outlook. Why are you fighting this? Most people on here seem to have a handle on the issues, then, suddenly, you step in and stir the pot. Are you a fukin' management dick or what?
You have made many arguementive statements on this board that have all been covered in the past....you should have been here in the last few months. Your arguements have been hashed and rehashed, so I have no inclination to go over the BS you claim to be true once again.
It will all come out in the wash......standby and see the truth.