No Land Green
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 760
- Reaction score
- 558
No one has answered my question yet.
Is the 190 arbitration still valid? Is the west still owed 1/3 of the 190's?
Don't we need to have a Joint CBA for that to happen?
No one has answered my question yet.
Is the 190 arbitration still valid? Is the west still owed 1/3 of the 190's?
Its FEAR that's causing them to scurry around like roaches when the lights come on!!
AWA320
Geez. Most guys take Playboys. Whatever floats your boat. Have at it.
I don't think it's fear of the unknown. More like fear of the inevitable. Or fear of the reality they refuse to accept.What does that all add up to Pi?? FEAR of the unknown
AWA320
While I obviously disagree, I respect the fact that instead of telling anyone how it's going to be, you rather present your view on how you believe things are, should be, and probably will be.I'm not telling you, or them, they are correct or incorrect, just being honest with you that fear is one emotion I haven't seen that with respect to this fight.
there is no unknown its DOH or nothing.
Nic is on a shelf forever.
One could see your constant posting and blathering about the issue of fear as projection bias. Maybe a last ditch emotional stand to deny the fact this isn't going to turn out the way you had convinced yourself. 😛h34r:
East vs. West was an ALPA thing. There is no East OR West to USAPA.Perhaps much like the east posters in the first 300 or so pages of this thread, when no one was listening and they were desperately tying to bait people into their world, even sending flame bait via PMs?
Perhaps it's just time to dish out some of your own medicine and see the results with the shoe on the other foot.
What's your opinion on the fact that USAPA seems to be unsuccessful in redirecting the profit sharing to the east?
No, not really. For most guys that support USAPA, there is no fear. They are convinced they will win, and they feel that even though the world is not fair and there is that slim chance they won't, there is nothing to lose by giving it a try. At least they will have delayed a travesty. They feel the lost wages and slim chance of damages as worth try.
I'm not telling you, or them, they are correct or incorrect, just being honest with you that fear is one emotion I haven't seen that with respect to this fight.
While I obviously disagree, I respect the fact that instead of telling anyone how it's going to be, you rather present your view on how you believe things are, should be, and probably will be.
Really?? Fear is what started the angry FO club! Fear that the west would migrate east and fill slots they wanted. They will lose because in this country one doenst get to toss aside and agreement just because they changed the name. Pi like I have said all along the tossing of the DJ should it even get tossed is not a victory. The real question LCC is asking the court is are they liable to the west having signed the TA and ACCEPTED the award and the answer is easy to get to. If the answer is YES then checkmate. If the answer is the court can not provide indemnity then checkmate. Usapa would need a resounding NO in order to claim a victoy. So in the end its the FEAR driving it and nothing else.
AWA320
One could see your constant posting and blathering about the issue of fear as projection bias. Maybe a last ditch emotional stand to deny the fact this isn't going to turn out the way you had convinced yourself. 😛h34r:
Back when Addington was being heard in Phoenix, our resident law expert, HP_FA, kept telling us that there would be no appeal unless Seham could come up with some procedural criteria (or something to that effect) because appeals courts do not try cases. Assuming that is true, what are the chances that Judge Silver will do something with the company's suit that is even subject to appeal? Of course, the company can file the appeal, but absent something compelling, the appeal will be quickly denied. It's only when an appeal is heard that the process seems to drag out....even into years. If the Ninth isn't interested (like the Addington requesting an en banc redo), the circuit can and does make very short shrift of the filing.
If the company decides unilaterally that they will only take the Nicolau abomination as Section 22, and USAPA holds fast to a DOH with C&R, I suspect THAT would constitute as stalemate, and the west would shortly again be able to scab struck work.
East & West isn’t an ALPA thing any more or less than is a USAPA thing. When the two airlines merged there were legacy “East” operations, workgroups, IT systems, stations, logos, liveries, res systems, uniforms, and there were west versions of the same. Since that time most of those systems and groups lost their East/West distinctions as East & West became one new group, system, or whatever. The pilots and the flight attendants and the resources they use still have East and West distinctions because both groups are still on separate CBAs. Until JCBAs are ratified, there will always be and East & West version of the pilots and FAs. Even the 9th who you guys love since they ruled on a lack of jurisdictional ripeness (and read way more into their ruling than is actually there), recognized and acknowledged that there are still two separate groups under USAPA. Once again you are just making stuff up because it sounds good to your tickling ears.East vs. West was an ALPA thing. There is no East OR West to USAPA.
You just like to stir the pot.
No, I don't think it was fear, it was "I'm mad as XXXX and I'm not going to take it anymore!"
I have no idea what the courts will say, but that is why I asked you to highlight the sections of the TA that you think USAPA is violating right now and let's add to it what sections you think the company would be violating by altering section 22. I can see the union being held liable, but if you take it word for word, it seems the company has lived up to the TA, as you said they have accepted the Nic award.