Move2CLT
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 6,048
- Reaction score
- 8,631
Or else what? You looking for something else to be put in your mouth?I have told you more than once to stop putting words in my mouth.
LMAO.
Or else what? You looking for something else to be put in your mouth?I have told you more than once to stop putting words in my mouth.
Oh look, ANOTHER opinion on what is fair AFTER agreeing to the process. What a surprise. See you in court Sunshine.PID is a WEAK alpa policy.. nothing to do with it.
As tempting as it is given how you seem to constantly have your mouth hanging open in surpirse, I'm not. Show me one place in that post where I wrongly claimed what you said...I have told you more than once to stop putting words in my mouth.
You can lie to yourself but you can't lie to the courts.as USAPA and the Company remain free to bargain, unconstrained by courts
PID is a WEAK alpa policy.. nothing to do with it.
Section 13 of the Allegheny-Mohawk order directs that when a dispute or controversy cannot be
settled by the affected parties within 20 days, either party may refer it to an arbitrator selected
from a panel of seven names furnished by the NMB.
You can lie to yourself but you can't lie to the courts.
Name the court that has placed an injunction on the bargaining parties. Surely you have a link for us. 😛
How is that Naugler case going?
Federal District Court for the 4th District in North Carolina.
ummm... that was easy...next usapa idiot!!!!!
As tempting as it is given how you seem to constantly have your mouth hanging open in surpirse, I'm not. Show me one place in that post where I wrongly claimed what you said...![]()
Jim
ARE YOU SURE! FACTS SAY DIFFERENT!How is that Naugler case going? The one that is trying to get commuter pilots that were furloughed from mainline better seniority. Would some of those 800 be included in that dead law suit?
You see it has already been tried and killed. Those 800 have not case. All the judge has to ask is what was the PID.
Case closed.