US Pilots Labor Discussion

[BoeingBoy]

You didn't state which side lied, you just said people lie under oath.

Sorry, it was discussed at the time so I thought everyone would know that it was an East witness who said it under oath.

Jim

ps - I'd advise buying the number of eggs your wife tells you to buy... 😀

Jim

 

[Pi brat]

but like most easties your moral beliefs don't jive with your actions in this case so you make things up in your mind to justify your unethical position to yourself.

Hey Scooter, what are my actions. I want you to show me. You don't have a clue.

 

[BoeingBoy]

Once again JIM your welcome to your opinion, but thats just my opinion, I think I will wait for a published opinion, then someone to publish an opinion on that opinion, all the time enjoying reading your opinion! Although you could say I'm totally wrong but that's my opinion and your wrong!BTW HAPPY HOLIDAY's! MM!

First, I'm just playing by oldie's rule - "any opinion that disagrees with my opinion is wrong because my opinion is always right". Second, while I agree that nothing said here will determine the outcome, all you East pilots seemed lonely without those who disagree chiming in. Just as you keep posting although it'll make no difference in the outcome.

Jim

 

[BoeingBoy]

Hey Scooter, what are my actions. I want you to show me. You don't have a clue.

You mean like you showed my why you bestowed the title of King of something or another? I'm still waiting for that proof. Or are you turning into Nos - demanding everyone on the other side to prove the truth of what they say while refusing to prove what he says?

Jim

 

[BoeingBoy]

That all depends on what the definition of "is" is.......... 😉

Sorry again - I mistakenly thought you were asking a question so I asked for clarification. Should have known better than to take you seriously, I guess.

Jim

 

[Pi brat]

You've got to remember that everyone involved in the seniority integration process is engaging in a lot of CYA. They don't want anyone blaming them for the outcome, so there's plenty of revisionist history coming from east of the Mississippi. Go all the way back to DFR1 and the sworn testimony that the arbitration was binding only on the MC - does any pilot on the East side think that was the truth? People who will lie under oath will lie about anything including who's fault this mess is.

Jim

So he is a liar? Wow Jim, if you only knew...........

I'll take his word over west revisionists any day.

 

[Pi brat]

You mean like you showed my why you bestowed the title of King of something or another? I'm still waiting for that proof. Or are you turning into Nos - demanding everyone on the other side to prove the truth of what they say while refusing to prove what he says?

Jim

Jim, I explained those words, remember? True or false-have I had to correct you when you made assumptions and put words in my mouth? If you want to carry fodase's water, you point out my unethical actions.

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

First, I'm just playing by oldie's rule - "any opinion that disagrees with my opinion is wrong because my opinion is always right". Second, while I agree that nothing said here will determine the outcome, all you East pilots seemed lonely without those who disagree chiming in. Just as you keep posting although it'll make no difference in the outcome.

Jim

IS that your opinion? MM!

 

[cleardirect]

Thanks for the info., but somebody needs a math lesson. I see 734 and fodase said signed by the majority. Did you happen to read any of the names? Like the guy that had his name several times in a row? How about Mr F.U.? Yeah boy! There is it, the smoking gun!

How many phone calls to the reps, e-mails and conversations took place? Those are not documented. Are you say that the majority of east pilots did not demand DOH?

 

[BoeingBoy]

So he is a liar? Wow Jim, if you only knew...........

Are you claiming that the truth is that only the MC was bound by the Nic award under ALPA merger policy? I find that really hard to believe...

Are you claiming that an East pilot didn't give that sworn testimony? I find that really hard to believe also...

Or are you claiming that only West pilots engage in revisionist history? That I can believe since it supports your opinions.

Jim

 

[BoeingBoy]

Jim, I explained those words, remember? True or false-have I had to correct you when you made assumptions and put words in my mouth? If you want to carry fodase's water, you point out my unethical actions.

Just like that earlier "explanation", another accusation. I rest my case. I think I bestow the title of Pi Nos on you.

Jim

 

[Pi brat]

How many phone calls to the reps, e-mails and conversations took place? Those are not documented. Are you say that the majority of east pilots did not demand DOH?

I don't know, you or fodase can tell us since it is YOUR claim. I don't know or have contact with the majority of east pilots so I can't speak for them (although that never stops most on the west), but the majority of my friends and those I was flying with at the time didn't think DOH would be the method.

BTW, in the end DOH wasn't even the east proposal, it was LOS, but don't let that FACT slow you down.

 

[Black Swan]

Bular is going over to France sooner than everyone thinks, picking up early 330-200's. You boyz in phx might just get a shot at flying PHX London or Paris. If the traffic is there. Others coming East also.

 

[Pi brat]

Just like that earlier "explanation", another accusation. I rest my case. I think I bestow the title of Pi Nos on you.

Jim

Rest this.

You seem pretty intelligent so it's hard for me to believe you are that dense. Or are you just being obstinate?

Better Nos that you Columbo.

 

[BoeingBoy]

BTW, in the end DOH wasn't even the east proposal, it was LOH, but don't let that FACT slow you down.

What is LOH - how long it took to get hired?

Jim