What's new

Wal-Mart

La Li Lu Le Lo said:
[font='Helvetica Neue'']"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need"[/font]
 
 You sound like a commie.
XT ' comment does not mean what you think it means.
 
Ms Tree said:
XT ' comment does not mean what you think it means.
I see you have taken it upon yourself to speak for others again. You are not even smart enough to speak for you. That is why half of your posts don't make sense and the other half flip-flop from previous statements.
 
The paraphrase quote that xUT made is based off of a comon quote.  Attempting to insult me does not change the meaning. 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_ability,_to_each_according_to_his_need
 
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need
 
Origin of the phrase
The complete paragraphs containing Marx's statement of the creed in the 'Critique of the Gotha Program' is as follows:
 
In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly—only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!
 
I. Nothing in society will belong to anyone, either as a personal possession or as capital goods, except the things for which the person has immediate use, for either his needs, his pleasures, or his daily work.
II. Every citizen will be a public man, sustained by, supported by, and occupied at the public expense.
III. Every citizen will make his particular contribution to the activities of the community according to his capacity, his talent and his age; it is on this basis that his duties will be determined, in conformity with the distributive laws.
 
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He_who_does_not_work,_neither_shall_he_eat
 
He who does not work, neither shall he eat
 
In the spring of 1609, John Smith cited the aphorism to the colonists of Jamestown:
 
Countrymen, the long experience of our late miseries I hope is sufficient to persuade everyone to a present correction of himself, And think not that either my pains nor the adventurers' purses will ever maintain you in idleness and sloth...
 
...the greater part must be more industrious, or starve...
 
You must obey this now for a law, that he that will not work shall not eat (except by sickness he be disabled). For the labors of thirty or forty honest and industrious men shall not be consumed to maintain a hundred and fifty idle loiterers
 
Seems they had a "welfare" problem even back then.
 
" For the labors of thirty or forty honest and industrious men shall not be consumed to maintain a hundred and fifty idle loiterers"
 
This is the problem with UNIONs today. This is exactly what I was talking about.
 
Ms Tree said:
The paraphrase quote that xUT made is based off of a comon quote.  Attempting to insult me does not change the meaning. 
I was not attempting to insult you. That is my honest opinion of you.
 
This was his post.
xUT said:
IMHO,
That is ridiculous. Everyone has their 'own' capacity.
His post has nothing to do with what you pasted.

Opinions and butt holes. Everyone has them.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
 
 You sound like a commie.
I didn't say that, you said that.
I simply stated that everyone has their 'own capacity'.
Not everyone on this planet is equal by either education and/or IQ.
 
It might just be that being a Wall-mart cashier is their level of capacity.
I seriously can not understand people that look down at people for their employment choices.
In SFO we had a janitor, hard worker but he was always ridiculed by the M&R for being 'less than normal'.
Poor guy was busting his a$$ and being heckled by 'smart folks'.
I have found that the people that make fun of him, where actually self deficient and not confident in their own abilities.
 
BTW what's a commie?
😛
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I see you have taken it upon yourself to speak for others again. You are not even smart enough to speak for you. That is why half of your posts don't make sense and the other half flip-flop from previous statements.
xUT said:
I didn't say that, you said that.
I simply stated that everyone has their 'own capacity'.
Not everyone on this planet is equal by either education and/or IQ.
 
It might just be that being a Wall-mart cashier is their level of capacity.
I seriously can not understand people that look down at people for their employment choices.
In SFO we had a janitor, hard worker but he was always ridiculed by the M&R for being 'less than normal'.
Poor guy was busting his a$$ and being heckled by 'smart folks'.
I have found that the people that make fun of him, where actually self deficient and not confident in their own abilities.
 
BTW what's a commie?
😛
Told you. You just don't listen.
 
xUT said:
I didn't say that, you said that.
I simply stated that everyone has their 'own capacity'.
Not everyone on this planet is equal by either education and/or IQ.
 
It might just be that being a Wall-mart cashier is their level of capacity.
I seriously can not understand people that look down at people for their employment choices.
In SFO we had a janitor, hard worker but he was always ridiculed by the M&R for being 'less than normal'.
Poor guy was busting his a$$ and being heckled by 'smart folks'.
I have found that the people that make fun of him, where actually self deficient and not confident in their own abilities.
 
BTW what's a commie?
😛
I do not believe your average long term cashier at Wal-Mart has reached their capacity. You sell people short when you make excuses for them.
 
I bet if the government ended "entitlement" programs you would find these people a lot more capable than you give them credit for.
 
Liberals love to turn the parasite into the victim.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top