prechilill
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Messages
- 2,544
- Reaction score
- 3,406
You easties have a NICe day, and maybe even a NICe weekend. I wonder what Monday will bring?
How did the 9th fix anything? They resolved nothing. They just complicated it. Doug wins.CallawayGolf said:Well that's that. Proposal status no more I guess.
The Ninth sure did make a mess of things six years ago, but at least they stepped up and fixed it to the only extend they good well after most of the damage was done. Congratulations to those who fought hard to bring about this long-overdue victory. It would be great if all the vitriol and such could be laid to rest now, but I suspect that's asking a lot after so long of a battle.
Good luck to all in the pending, NIC-inclusive SLI process.
prechilill said:There really isn't much to say after the 9th's ruling, they summarized the east holes' deviant behavior quite well. And this comes just in time for the SLI with APA… seems to coincidental, doesn't it? Regardless, the east holes have lost, we will see the NIC implemented soon, possibly by the next system bid at US. I'm looking forward to flying the big bus!
They fixed their nonsensical not ripe ruling and affirmed the Addington I ruling by the jury. A legal victory for the west and the entire binding arbitration process in general. The full and complete integration of all east, west and legacy AA pilots is still a long way from being done.Phoenix said:How did the 9th fix anything? They resolved nothing. They just complicated it. Doug wins.
prechilill said:There really isn't much to say after the 9th's ruling, they summarized the east holes' deviant behavior quite well. And this comes just in time for the SLI with APA… seems to coincidental, doesn't it? Regardless, the east holes have lost, we will see the NIC implemented soon, possibly by the next system bid at US. I'm looking forward to flying the big bus!
MB is the statute that governs the SLI, not Addington.CallawayGolf said:They fixed their nonsensical not ripe ruling and affirmed the Addington I ruling by the jury. A legal victory for the west and the entire binding arbitration process in general. The full and complete integration of all east, west and legacy AA pilots is still a long way from being done.
Nice that west legal fees can be offset by USAPA, or whatever is left of it anyway.
Crzipilot said:
Thanks prechill, I hope you get the big bus, I did that type of flying years ago, been on every continent. No real need to do it any more. Why don't you PM me your name and number we can talk about how it's gonna be to fly with you?!?!?1
I'm sure it will be exciting!!!!!!
I can't disagree with that. How this ruling might effect the new SLI might never be fully known.Phoenix said:MB is the statute that governs the SLI, not Addington.
The statutory authorities (of the former bargaining agents in the covered transaction) have not been litigated. Those authorities were hotly contested between APA and USAPA. To get past a long drawn out court case to litigate those authorities APA and USAPA entered into a binding contract, the protocol agreement.
The protocol agreement was the fix. That agreement was obliterated and the former dispute between the former bargaining agents is now once again at issue, not only for USAPA's sake but now also for APA. We had finally taken one step forward and the 9th rushed in to send us back two steps.
"Let's see what happens now." Said the mischievous judge with a cat-ate-the-bird grin.
How it affects the protocol agreement is the issue, not the SLI. Even before that, the courts never had before them MB and the SLI... It was always DFR (and ironically never the protocol agreement).CallawayGolf said:I can't disagree with that. How this ruling might effect the new SLI might never be fully known.