2015 Pilot Discussion.

[Claxon]

Well, I'll give you this...this video is only 3 years old rather than the DECADES old (or more) drivel that you post.  Here's a new warning:  "Final & Binding" - (just like the last one).

If the last one was Final and Binding, why the new push for another?
The Nic is far older than Crandalls video.

Your thoughts Cactusboy53 ?

 

[cactusboy53]

If the last one was Final and Binding, why the new push for another?
The Nic is far older than Crandalls video.
Your thoughts Cactusboy53 ?

And yet 2 of the 3 parties are arguing that the product of an agreed upon process should be the starting point for all of the LUS process.

My thoughts? WE have all (3) agreed to a SLI arbitration, and the list that is delivered by that process. If you need to wrap your head around that REALITY (again), let me know. I can buy you a cup of cocoa and explain it to you....

Oh wait. If you don't think the outcome is "fair", you guys hold your breath & find a lawyer to take your money.

 

[Phoenix]

Freund disagreed that all three groups agreed to the PA. Not to worry, the panel doesn't give a s£!t what lawyers think of the panel authority.

"Take your money." That right there is funny. Did you have to peer through the reflection of your neon tie glowing on your computer screen when you typed that?

 

[cactusboy53]

Freund disagreed that all three groups agreed to the PA. Not to worry, the panel doesn't give a s£!t what lawyers think of the panel authority.
"Take your money." That right there is funny. Did you have to peer through the reflection of your neon tie glowing on your computer screen when you typed that?

Well, we researched & interviewed. Researched more, got references and made a selection. We've kept the same stellar team since you boys gathered your toys and went home to cry to your Mama.

How many legal firms and Lawyers have you cycled (or recycled) through? Never mind, we already know.

 

[Black Swan]

And yet 2 of the 3 parties are arguing that the product of an agreed upon process should be the starting point for all of the LUS process.
My thoughts? WE have all (3) agreed to a SLI arbitration, and the list that is delivered by that process. If you need to wrap your head around that REALITY (again), let me know. I can buy you a cup of cocoa and explain it to you....
Oh wait. If you don't think the outcome is "fair", you guys hold your breath & find a lawyer to take your money.

You state over and over the Nic. was " final and binding" Then you state 2 of 3 parties argue it is the starting point. I disagree. The Nic was awarded in 2007. Yet it has never been used. If it were binding, it would have been in effect 7 yrs ago. It is not. Why would you even have to argue it if it were in force and binding?
It required a JCBA to make it binding. There was no JCBA. No Nic.

 

[cactusboy53]

Click those heels Swanny. I'm sure it'll be just fine.

 

[nevergiveup]

Cactus boy seems to into this thing with guys in heels and clicking them. Hey, to each his own!

 

[luvthe9]

Cactus boy seems to into this thing with guys in heels and clicking them. Hey, to each his own!

Was thinking the same thing, guess the Wizard of Oz was his favorite move.

 

[cactusboy53]

Was thinking the same thing, guess the Wizard of Oz was his favorite move.

Nah Dude! My very favorite movie is The Patriot. That's where Mel Gibson's character shoves independence down Colonel Tavington's gullet.

If you're not a cinema buff, that's OK. The heels reference is a jab at your continued attempted path to the land of "No-Nic-for-you". Dorothy simply had to click her heels to return to Kansas, and then she woke up there! I wonder where you'll be when you wake up?

 

[nevergiveup]

I can see him dancing around his computer and singing, "If I only had a brain!"

 

[Phoenix]

Well, we researched & interviewed. Researched more, got references and made a selection. We've kept the same stellar team since you boys gathered your toys and went home to cry to your Mama.
How many legal firms and Lawyers have you cycled (or recycled) through? Never mind, we already know.

Who paid for our lawyers, and your lawyers. <<----- Rhetorical sarcasm/gloating

Your newest lawsuit is "repeating the same thing while expecting a different result."

As always, good luck!!

 

[traderjake]

USAPA supporters love coercion and the tyranny of the majority.
 
The even brag about it .

 

[luvthe9]

USAPA supporters love coercion and the tyranny of the majority.
 
The even brag about it .

There is no USAPA to support Einstein,..........."The even brag about it"............grammar.



Still afraid to upgrade?

 

[traderjake]

Glad to see you took a break from making a fool of yourself on C&R. 

 

[nic4us]

You state over and over the Nic. was " final and binding" Then you state 2 of 3 parties argue it is the starting point. I disagree. The Nic was awarded in 2007. Yet it has never been used. If it were binding, it would have been in effect 7 yrs ago. It is not. Why would you even have to argue it if it were in force and binding?
It required a JCBA to make it binding. There was no JCBA. No Nic.

 
You are spreading the same false logic the scab union propaganda ministers were always inclined to spit out to anyone who would listen.
 
First falsehood..the Nic required a JCBA to make it binding.  Absolutely false.  
 
The truth is the TA required a JCBA to be fulfilled, and then the Nic would have been implemented at LCC.
 
The Nic is still final and binding on the parties to the arbitration.  Those same parties are now in another SLI.
 
The Nic was "in effect" 7 years ago and is still "in effect" today.  Seven years ago there was only one company accepted single seniority list for all LCC pilots, and that has never changed.