usairways_vote_NO
Veteran
- Sep 9, 2002
- 1,882
- 57
BillLumbergh said:Same comment applies here. Folks need to put the attitude in check.
[post="229600"][/post]
Seems 320 attitude posted again a little cornfield action warranted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BillLumbergh said:Same comment applies here. Folks need to put the attitude in check.
[post="229600"][/post]
usairways_vote_NO said:Seems 320 attitude posted again a little cornfield action warranted?
[post="229607"][/post]
USA320Pilot said:Fr8tmastr:
I take no special pleasure in seeing people take cuts. In fact, if the unions had participated earlier in the process, the cuts would have been less. Who on this board lobbied for that to occur?
[post="229605"][/post]
DCAflyer said:I want to go on record also as saying that I think the negotiating committee and AFA did an incredible job. The CHAOS threat worked, and worked well, and showed this airline and others that flight attendants are a force to be reconed with. Teddy, Perry, and the rest have really showed the Lorenzoites of this industry that we will work WITH management, but we will NOT be scared into the corner and forced to capitulate... nor will we sell our junior brothers and sisters down the river like other labor groups have done over and over and over. We are in this together, with our fellow flight attendants, with other labor groups, and now with management, to return this airline to the grand institution it once was.
[post="229642"][/post]
:huh: Sorry but those who took voluntary furlough have had the opportunity to change their lives, move on and rebuild.Those who stayed in the trenches and waited deserve to be compensated. Im sorry for the vol furloughees, but thy went VOLUNTARILY, and are still on the senority list. Something must be said for those who "hung in there " Dont u think !!blueoceans said:From what I've heard, the tentative agreement does not treat all members fairly (ex. voluntary furloughs, retirees). If there is one thing a union should do, it's provide fair/equal treatment to every single member. If not, it's a miscarriage of justice (a la ALPA).
[post="229587"][/post]
YES, for a concessionary agreement, i think AFA did an outstanding job!! Thanks to all their hard work- they did a fine job and should be commended!!! Happpy Holidays and wishes for a much BRIGHTER 2005!!! Peaceflyguy121 said:I also would like to add my appreciation for a seemingly job well done by AFA and the Negotiating Committee. While not ideal, it seems as though the damage has been spread around evenly...with no one "segment" of the F/A's bearing the brunt of an unfair new set of workrules or pay. I think AFA did well in representing the F/A Group and balanced the interest of boths the Junior and the Senior Folks quite nicely...making an attractive offer for Sally Senior to leave and offering Jenny Junior some hope to return at the same rate of pay as the rest of the rank and file...
NICE JOB AFA!
[post="229671"][/post]
USA320Pilot said:Abonny:
The AFA hit their cost cut target and changed different parts of their contract to meet their needs, such as no DC retirement plan payments for 3 years to lower the wage rate cut.
For example, the real cut to combined pay rates and DC retirement plan contributions are 12% per year for three years.
There is not a need for comparison of ALPA & AFA contracts because the Negotiating Committees (NC) selected different points of interest, but I agree the ALPA RC4 hurt the pilot group more than necessary.
For example, ALPA has a 10% DC plan annual contribution and the AFA no DC plan annual contribution for 3 years and 3% thereafter. Why? ALPA wants tax deferred dollars and AFA wants less of a pay cut now.
Best regards,
USA320Pilot
[post="229579"][/post]