Cactus737
Advanced
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 0
1) Umm..sure...if you say so. There's never been an apparent lack of "Little Birds" speaking to folks out west it seems, and those birds seem to chirp only what you wish to hear and believe, aka : "You won't even get 200 cards!"/etc. Now? it's just variations on "Umm..well..what we really meant is nobody will actually vote for dumping Alpo"....Whatever gets you through the day I guess :blink:
I don't think that some of the East Council fastreads and ALPA web-board posts qualify as "little birds". Don't get me wrong - I don't see those guys being dumb enough to approve a TA that includes an unadultered Nic, but I do see them being rational enough to see what an ugly hopeless path USAPA is.
2) My personal levels of hypocrisy don't extend to wanting ANYTHING from the west by way of seats, upgrades, or "seniority". I've no wishes for any of you to suffer lesser pay rates so that any east pilot can "Get mine". I don't offer battle cries of "Then you can live on LOA93 forvever!" or wish you guys ANY ill, nor do I justify any/all of my beliefs or behaviors on some Alpoid "process" or arbitrator's whim.....so yeah..I'm quite comfortable with using the term "moral".
See - that's the problem. We are one company now and what you believe you were going to get as a stand-alone comes at MY expense now that we're one. A 20% RIF BEFORE the merger would not have me furloughed, but under DOH it does. I don't want your seat or upgrade, but I don't want to be your furlough fodder either.
As for the LOA 93 forever - that's something I hear East pilots boast about. Which is horribly inconsistent with the "my seniority is not for sale" concept. IE - you'll work cheap for date of hire.
3) You can't have it both ways. Either A) Your curent MEC chairman's actually a moron (which I doubt) who poorly selected that fellow for AWAPA's counsel, and has only lately found great wisdom through complete immersion in Alpo, or B, You're grasping at the tiniest of twisted straws in feeble attempts at advancing irrational positions. You make much of the apparent signifigance of TWA folks having "never turned in a card" as being noteworthy on one hand, ...while presenting the implicit argument that turning in oceans of cards actually means nothing on the east....At least one of us is definately "confused" here. :blink:
I was told, though not by John Mc directly, that the primary purpose of AWAPA was to keep ALPA on it's toes and "interested" in the AWA pilots during our last contract talks, and not to actually replace the bargaining agent. Unfortunately, even though he did attract more ALPA interest, our REAL problem was the ATSB restrictions and not ALPA. The majority around here thinks that drive only created division in our ranks when we needed to be unified.
It's hard to argue that USAPA hasn't created alot of leverage for the AAA MEC. After all, do you really think it took Prater several months to figure out that the list is the list? Of course not, he knew that on May 4th, and he spent those months playing games with merger policy in an attempt to leverage us into capitulating. I'm sure he's not done trying by the way, and I really wouldn't be surprised if he ended up hosing us before the vote. ALPA's legal liability in a suit from the West might be less than what it would cost to lose the property.
Sorry that was confusing, but the part about USAPA putting all of it's eggs in one basket with this guy could not be more clear.