Assuming it's correct, I've got a few questions that are driving me nuts. Why wait to announce the "details"? Why only release "details" at first? And what is there to put together? They have the agreement, scan it and post it!
Word is not much has changed at all. The company feels since Bloch ruled in thier
favor that we as a group are open to getting an agreement in place. They are basically
sending back the same propsal minus CIC languaga and profit sharing taken out. The
company and the IAM feel we are in dire need and that a vote taken now will put the TA
in place. I'm gonna read it tomorrow (sunday) and decide what to make of it but if it is
indeed similiar to the past TA than it will be another NO vote from me and time to replace
Canale and get ready for 09'.
Remeber we did not ask to sit down at a table to talk about a TA. The company asked the IAM
to sit and in doing so has held up the West from going into section's talk. The IAM wants your dues
and the company knows this and the company wants a TA for a possible buyout or merge and the
IAM knows this. Nothing is being played above board both sides are looking out for thier best
interests and thats' fine as the company goes but the IAM is our dues paying represenitive and
they are certainly not looking out for us but for themselves, the United M&R IAM.
Read this proposal
carefully and talk about it , ask questions and vote. It's gonna bother me if indeed this is the
same proposal with a different date but same backing from our NC.