WorldTraveler said:
I'm not flaming and I am not trying to start a war.
if there is no known answer, then why the repeated "it will come in X time?"
if we can't know when it will come, then just wait for the vote to be announced.
uh.... im a little confused here. Just what in the world are you talking about?
WorldTraveler said:
and you are absolutely right that DL people will look at what unions have accomplished vs. what they are promising DL people and the IAM has been badly scarred... and given that WN is dragging out the whole process doesn't instill confidence that unions can get increases near as fast as they have promised.
that is not anywhere close to what I said dude. Cards are clearly coming in, the issue I see is that maybe the IAM, only the IAM, could have an issue at Delta.
but the issue for people like you is, while the IAM has the worst scope (at UA) it also have the best scope(at US) so if AA/US end up with the PMUS scope then that will be a big win for the IAM.........and a great way to get votes at Delta. (because again, it would mean Delta would have to add at least 15 or so below wing stations over night)
WorldTraveler said:
all the QOL stuff is fluff.... if DL people have to take a step back economically or risk lengthy negotiations, they will just stick with what they have. I don't need to do a survey to figure that out... it is basic economic sense.
No, QOL isn't fluff. What an amazingly stupid comment to say.
100 bucks an hour pay rate doesn't mean jack piss if your station is outsourced.
100% profit sharing wouldn't mean jack piss if your station is outsourced
30 bucks an hour doesn't mean jack piss if you have not health care insurance
etc. etc. etc.
You are a complete and total fool, and anyone who also agrees with what you just said is in the same boat, if you think pay is all that matters. The reason it matters to you is because, today, its a "delta wins" talking point. (and the carriers that do have higher pay do not count because you say so)
but if AA matches Delta's pay rates then its profit sharing.
If they were to match that it would be something else.
then something else.
on and on we go.
But back here in this place called the real world, the total QOL, which includes but isn't limited to pay, is what really matters. (but that is because for most of us it isn't some ego trip talking point, its real life.)
Kev3188 said:
Exactly.
And really, given that the anti-labor crowd currently has what it wants, one has to ask; what's the rush?
At this point, the ramp is meeting it's targeted goals...
All good things in time.
Thats good to hear then.
WorldTraveler said:
and the obvious answer to that question is "no more than it affects 700" but he plays like his life depends on it.....
If 700 has ties to the industry, even as a retired person then that is completely false. (assuming he was front line, not management like yourself)
WorldTraveler said:
you missed that I don't care about like or dislike buttons.
that is a tool that was dreamed up by people who can't cope with the realities of the facts on the table.
all that matters on the labor issue is whether DL people sign enough cards to call a vote AND THEN ALSO to vote for a union.
and as much as some people want to try to frame it otherwise, some of ours are really pro-DL people, not anti-labor.
If a union actually delivered what DL people wanted, I would be all over unionization... .but the unions haven't delivered and thus I can't offer any positive recommendation for them at DL.
It has been pointed out to you time and time and time and time and time and time again that unions have done a lot for Delta.
Please pick a work group and I will be more than happy to point it out again for you. (or I will be happy to point to unions CBAs that are better than current Delta)
.......AGAIN......