What's new

Grassroots Efforts at DL for ACS and FAs, no personal attacks.

Status
Not open for further replies.
WorldTraveler said:
and yet WN employees have ENORMOUS retirement accounts because of profit sharing and they have gotten it every year for a long, long time.

"it isn't guaranteed" is simply a copy out for those who aren't willing to believe that their company is run well enough to compete with the best in the business and to the benefit of their employees - which you have repeatedly said you can't do
not at all. 
 
but you are a fool if you believe things can't turn on a dime. 
 
 
Anyone remember Delta in 1999 and 2000? IIRC one of those years was one of the year the industry saw some of its biggest profits ever. Life was great.
 
Then at 846 on September 11, 2001 the world changed.  
 
Anyone remember what happened to those profits after that? I do. 
 
 
Do I think Delta is in a place to with-stand a small hickup? yes. But if the economy hits the s**ter hard core (due to 9/11 type event, war, whatever) I believe profitsharing is gone. (and probably the 5th week of vacation...again) 
 
This is an up and down industry. Its up right now. history says it will be down again. 
 
I remember.   DL also begun shuttering stations at the time too    My dad took retirement over uncertainty of going to a different station   I most of the rampers at that time in the station (before I came to my current one) and they lost their jobs by end of 2001
 
robbedagain said:
I remember.   DL also begun shuttering stations at the time too    My dad took retirement over uncertainty of going to a different station   I most of the rampers at that time in the station (before I came to my current one) and they lost their jobs by end of 2001
Delta started dumping ramp stations well before then too. Delta has always been the leading airline when it comes to outsourcing vs other legacies. 
 
Thanks to Delta and DALPA we have the 76-seater problem we have now. IIRC DALPA has been the leader in the last few years in giving up more and more large RJs. (also been quite useless in controlling outsourcing of international flying via JVs.) 
DGS and Ready reserve is all i can say about Delta's ACS.
And TechOps is still the only of the big four that doesn't do a single HMV in-house. Sad that Southwest, the king of outsourcing MX, does two lines in-house. Delta does zero. (and according to WT just has so much lower costs......)
 
robbedagain said:
sad....  🙁
On the ramp side, Ron Allen had the great plan of DGSing the hubs. I believe he even did so in Dallas. 
 
Kind of amazing that the only reason DFW is a ramp station for Delta is because NW brought it over.......... 
 
not at all. 
 
but you are a fool if you believe things can't turn on a dime. 
 
 
Anyone remember Delta in 1999 and 2000? IIRC one of those years was one of the year the industry saw some of its biggest profits ever. Life was great.
 
Then at 846 on September 11, 2001 the world changed.  
 
Anyone remember what happened to those profits after that? I do. 
 
 
Do I think Delta is in a place to with-stand a small hickup? yes. But if the economy hits the s**ter hard core (due to 9/11 type event, war, whatever) I believe profitsharing is gone. (and probably the 5th week of vacation...again) 
 
This is an up and down industry. Its up right now. history says it will be down again.
and you clearly don't understand what DL did in 2005-7 to ensure that DL would be like WN that could remain profitable despite the ups and downs of the industry.

since you make the charge that DL's profits will be transitory but fail to acknowledge that WN has been profitable, how about you tell us what WN has done that has allowed them to be profitable.

hint. the difference between WN and DL's costs is now LESS than the difference between DL and UA's costs.

it ain't about costs anymore.

we need to seriously get to the bottom of this issue. It is simply amazing that someone who claims to have business degrees and has been in a position to hear DL execs tell DL employees why DL has changed its business model continues to spout what happened years ago.

I'm not letting it go, dawg.

Perhaps its time that you have a little sit down with someone from mgmt. to help you understand what DL has done to change its business model. I'll be happy to arrange a meeting.

or you can use all of that wonderful Georgia education you claim to have received and your access to DLnet and DL resources - written and in person - to help you figure it all out.

let us know your choice.
 
On the ramp side, Ron Allen had the great plan of DGSing the hubs. I believe he even did so in Dallas. 
 
Kind of amazing that the only reason DFW is a ramp station for Delta is because NW brought it over..........
given that I was greatly impacted by 7.5 and yet managed to overcome it, I am hardly going to stand up for the tactic that Ron Allen used.

however, isn't it insightful that the biggest challenge to DL by WN came with WN's acquisition of FL which has resulted in the biggest competitive pulldown in the history of any DL hub. dozens of cities that FL served from ATL are closed and dozens more are now served with such low frequencies that they won't survive esp. given that ULCCs will offer competition in many of those markets.
Ron Allen might have done a terrible job of deciding on the way to become competitive with WN but he was dead right about the necessity of DL closing the cost gap with WN and the low cost carriers and now being able to compete with the ULCCs.

but since you deny that DL even is trying to compete with the ULCCs, it's not likely that you even believe it is necessary for DL to compete with LCCs.
 
I can still remember when DFW was one of DL largest hubs  now it seems like they are what PIT is to US  only may be a few more flights added??
 
Robbed, it is great to talk about the good ole days … but the reality is that DL in the past 12 years –after the cuts from 9/11 sunk in – is a far larger airline than what DL was before it was dismantled.

DFW was DL’s 4th largest hub with 566,000 seats in July 2003, less than half the size of CVG.
But in the last 12 years, DL has added as many seats as DTW has in total today – and DTW is DL’s 3rd largest hub with 1.3 million seats per month with MSP ahead with 1.5M seats.
SLC is slightly bigger but the big movement has come at JFK which is now larger than SLC, LAX with over 700,000 seats per month, and LGA with 678K seats. DL’s SEA hub is the smallest that is above 500K seats per month.

The biggest difference is that DTW and MSP are both as large as CVG was at its peak while LGA and JFK are each larger than DFW.

AA also has 8 hubs that have more than 500,000 seats per month. For Aug 2015, it is CLT, PHL, PHX, DFW, ORD, MIA, LAX, and DCA. DL’s SEA hub by this summer is larger than AA at LGA.

For UA, it is IAH, ORD, EWR, SFO, DEN, IAD, LAX

DL's network is far larger than it was in 2003 and DL's top hubs (larger than 500K seats per month) are larger than AA or UA's.
 
WorldTraveler said:
and you clearly don't understand what DL did in 2005-7 to ensure that DL would be like WN that could remain profitable despite the ups and downs of the industry.
You do know that Delta posted losses a few years after BK yes?
 
 
WorldTraveler said:
since you make the charge that DL's profits will be transitory but fail to acknowledge that WN has been profitable, how about you tell us what WN has done that has allowed them to be profitable.
because Delta now compared to WN then isn't apples to apples. 
 
WN had baby costs, was the media darling and was just a completely different animal even from what it is today. (and the market place was completely different too)
 
WN and Delta's costs are closer now, but WN's costs have also drastically increased since the early 2000s. 

 
WorldTraveler said:
we need to seriously get to the bottom of this issue. It is simply amazing that someone who claims to have business degrees and has been in a position to hear DL execs tell DL employees why DL has changed its business model continues to spout what happened years ago.
I'm sorry, but exactly who do you think you are? 
 
You are simply a fool, a complete and total fool, if you believe that any airline is going to be drastically profitable after a 9/11 type event. I don't give a hot damn what Delta's costs are or what the balance sheet looks like. They are not going to make money if people aren't flying and the economy is collapsing. Its just that simple.   
 
WorldTraveler said:
I'm not letting it go, dawg.
give me a minute and i will see if I can find a ounce of give a crap to give............

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nope. Don't care. 
WorldTraveler said:
Perhaps its time that you have a little sit down with someone from mgmt. to help you understand what DL has done to change its business model. I'll be happy to arrange a meeting.
Uh.... thanks but no thanks. I completely understand whats going on at Delta and the industry in general. I do believe that for the most part Delta has cleaned up its balance sheet enough to weather a small to medium economic storm.
But no airline or company is not going to be hurting in an economic collapse like we saw in this industry post 9/11. Do i believe Delta will be back in BK again? not really. But i would expect them to post losses if no one is flying. (and to the point, if that happens profit sharing becomes zero.)    
 
WorldTraveler said:
or you can use all of that wonderful Georgia education you claim to have received and your access to DLnet and DL resources - written and in person - to help you figure it all out.
Yeah as I said above I don't need to do anything. Only thing I could do is put on the wedget glasses and stupidly think Delta is untouchable. 
I truly hope the people running Delta are not nearly that stupid. I know the management teams you were are part of were, which is why we got to go down the road we did, but I believe the current management isn't anything like what you are use too...........
 
WorldTraveler said:
let us know your choice.
Again I will ask, who are you? Are you my mother? 
I will again try and find a single ounce of crap to give about your opinion about me.....
 
 
 
 
wait.....
 
 
 
 
maybe....
 
 
 
 
 
nope sorry. could not give any less of a crap.  
 
WorldTraveler said:
given that I was greatly impacted by 7.5 and yet managed to overcome it, I am hardly going to stand up for the tactic that Ron Allen used.
Oh no. 
Oh hellllll no. 
you need to tell us how friggin great it was. 
 
Jeesh what kind of friggin horse crap is that? Bankruptcy and outsourcing is great. Its grand. Its a good thing man. 
 
 
Oh but 7.5 sucked because it effected me. Now that i am just a keyboard worrier I can step back as say how great it is to see airline employees get screwed over because I got mine so piss on yall. 
 
what a f%&king joke you are. smgdh 
 
WorldTraveler said:
Robbed, it is great to talk about the good ole days … but the reality is that DL in the past 12 years –after the cuts from 9/11 sunk in – is a far larger airline than what DL was before it was dismantled.

DFW was DL’s 4th largest hub with 566,000 seats in July 2003, less than half the size of CVG.
But in the last 12 years, DL has added as many seats as DTW has in total today – and DTW is DL’s 3rd largest hub with 1.3 million seats per month with MSP ahead with 1.5M seats.
SLC is slightly bigger but the big movement has come at JFK which is now larger than SLC, LAX with over 700,000 seats per month, and LGA with 678K seats. DL’s SEA hub is the smallest that is above 500K seats per month.

The biggest difference is that DTW and MSP are both as large as CVG was at its peak while LGA and JFK are each larger than DFW.

AA also has 8 hubs that have more than 500,000 seats per month. For Aug 2015, it is CLT, PHL, PHX, DFW, ORD, MIA, LAX, and DCA. DL’s SEA hub by this summer is larger than AA at LGA.

For UA, it is IAH, ORD, EWR, SFO, DEN, IAD, LAX

DL's network is far larger than it was in 2003 and DL's top hubs (larger than 500K seats per month) are larger than AA or UA's.
 
 
huh? DFW peaked at over 450 flights. LGA and JFK are about half of that. Also CVG was bigger than DTW/MSP have ever been at least under DL. CVG peaked at almost 600 flights. 
 
Dawg during those peak days when dfw was a hub did dl run intl flights out of there?
 
robbedagain said:
Dawg during those peak days when dfw was a hub did dl run intl flights out of there?
at one time or another Delta had international flights on 
DFW-ACA, MEX, FRA, MTY, and PBC. 
 
The Delta terminal even had its own (small) customs facility. 
 
huh? DFW peaked at over 450 flights. LGA and JFK are about half of that. Also CVG was bigger than DTW/MSP have ever been at least under DL. CVG peaked at almost 600 flights.
 
CVG indeed was at almost 600 flights but the majority were 50 seat jets. that is why the economics of hubs that were heavily reliant on 50 seat jet feet - and MEM was the same thing - were not viable after $3/gal jet fuel became the norm.

CVG was DL's attempt at trying to decentralize DL's network away from ATL - which is why at its peak CVG had 5 TATL flights and a fairly strong presence of SR/SN which was DL's partner at the time.

But since CVG lies within a couple miles of the same interstate that connects ATL and DTW, it was obvious that it wasn't going to be viable with the NW merger. DTW has a stronger manufacturing base and despite the cuts DL has managed to keep most of the business traffic at CVG.

also, what you and others fail to appreciate is that DL essentially rolled the entire capacity that was at CVG into ATL; the capacity that was at DFW is now at JFK and LGA and then some.

IOW DL's capacity at ATL has grown as much as CVG as shrunk and in terms of seats, LGA and JFK are the size of CVG now - with DFW representing the additional growth that happened.

DTW and MSP are essentially new additions to the DL network - NW did an outstanding strategic job of building those hubs will DL's primary contribution being using the 777s and now 332 to add more Asia service to DTW operating at the same time.

airlines are not static. Changes take place in airline networks.

E has long argued that AA closed RDU and BNA which were AA's attempt to surround and divide ATL but it didn't work. CLT is the only hub that has been a viable alternative to ATL.

as such, I can accept E's statement that AA wisely redeployed its assets to defend MIA at a time when doing so helped push UA out of MIA.

holding onto a hub strategy from the past for any airline doesn't work including regarding DFW.

DL didn't have the local market share at DFW to make it viable as a hub for DL. Further, from a strategic standpoint, DL's pulldown of DFW laid the groundwork for the repeal of the Wright restrictions which we are now seeing is going to dramatically weaken AA's control of its home hub.

UA has yet to really focus on the hub restructuring that DL did and AA hasn't post merger either. UA's closure of CLE and refocusing LAX on local traffic have both worked based on available data. based on schedule data, it looks like IAD is the next to be trimmed.

As for AA, it is precisely because they have so many RJs - which they can't get out of - that they can't really restructure their hubs - and that is compounded by the fact that they are still using two res systems and two revenue mgmt. systems so their hubs are not linked together. thus a single res system will come first but eventually, AA will have to get rid of some of its duplicate hubs.

thus, the fact that DL has finished its rationalization of its network post merger but AA and UA isn't is no reason to think that DL has done something that other carriers will not.

and there are plenty of people here who are pretty emotional about PIT which is just as bare as CVG inside a fairly nice looking terminal.




 
You do know that Delta posted losses a few years after BK yes?
 
 
because Delta now compared to WN then isn't apples to apples. 
 
WN had baby costs, was the media darling and was just a completely different animal even from what it is today. (and the market place was completely different too)
 
WN and Delta's costs are closer now, but WN's costs have also drastically increased since the early 2000s. 

 
I'm sorry, but exactly who do you think you are? 
 
You are simply a fool, a complete and total fool, if you believe that any airline is going to be drastically profitable after a 9/11 type event. I don't give a hot damn what Delta's costs are or what the balance sheet looks like. They are not going to make money if people aren't flying and the economy is collapsing. Its just that simple.   
 
give me a minute and i will see if I can find a ounce of give a crap to give............
Nope. Don't care. 
Uh.... thanks but no thanks. I completely understand whats going on at Delta and the industry in general. I do believe that for the most part Delta has cleaned up its balance sheet enough to weather a small to medium economic storm.
But no airline or company is not going to be hurting in an economic collapse like we saw in this industry post 9/11. Do i believe Delta will be back in BK again? not really. But i would expect them to post losses if no one is flying. (and to the point, if that happens profit sharing becomes zero.)    
 
Yeah as I said above I don't need to do anything. Only thing I could do is put on the wedget glasses and stupidly think Delta is untouchable. 
I truly hope the people running Delta are not nearly that stupid. I know the management teams you were are part of were, which is why we got to go down the road we did, but I believe the current management isn't anything like what you are use too...........
 
Again I will ask, who are you? Are you my mother? 
I will again try and find a single ounce of crap to give about your opinion about me.....
 
nope sorry. could not give any less of a crap.  
 
Oh no. 
Oh hellllll no. 
you need to tell us how friggin great it was. 
 
Jeesh what kind of friggin horse crap is that? Bankruptcy and outsourcing is great. Its grand. Its a good thing man. 
 
 
Oh but 7.5 sucked because it effected me. Now that i am just a keyboard worrier I can step back as say how great it is to see airline employees get screwed over because I got mine so piss on yall. 
 
what a f%&king joke you are. smgdh
IOW, you don't really care about being rational or logical because you personally have been harmed by DL's strategic actions from the past, can't get over it, and will finish your career at DL and then some nursing ill will because of DFW.

rarely do people on here post for any length of time before their real motives become apparent.

I'm sorry you were negatively impacted by DL's decision to close DFW. there are plenty of people who cram onto the few remaining seats whenever they can get them to get on flights to ATL. you are hardly alone.

the past is over.

move on. If your mother didn't or wouldn't tell you to do it, then you shouldn't be surprised that you run into people on the internet that will tell you what you should do.

until then, every post you write about how DL has treated you are colored with the same perspective.
 
WorldTraveler said:
 
CVG indeed was at almost 600 flights but the majority were 50 seat jets. that is why the economics of hubs that were heavily reliant on 50 seat jet feet - and MEM was the same thing - were not viable after $3/gal jet fuel became the norm.

CVG was DL's attempt at trying to decentralize DL's network away from ATL - which is why at its peak CVG had 5 TATL flights and a fairly strong presence of SR/SN which was DL's partner at the time.

But since CVG lies within a couple miles of the same interstate that connects ATL and DTW, it was obvious that it wasn't going to be viable with the NW merger. DTW has a stronger manufacturing base and despite the cuts DL has managed to keep most of the business traffic at CVG.

also, what you and others fail to appreciate is that DL essentially rolled the entire capacity that was at CVG into ATL; the capacity that was at DFW is now at JFK and LGA and then some.

IOW DL's capacity at ATL has grown as much as CVG as shrunk and in terms of seats, LGA and JFK are the size of CVG now - with DFW representing the additional growth that happened.

DTW and MSP are essentially new additions to the DL network - NW did an outstanding strategic job of building those hubs will DL's primary contribution being using the 777s and now 332 to add more Asia service to DTW operating at the same time.

airlines are not static. Changes take place in airline networks.

E has long argued that AA closed RDU and BNA which were AA's attempt to surround and divide ATL but it didn't work. CLT is the only hub that has been a viable alternative to ATL.

as such, I can accept E's statement that AA wisely redeployed its assets to defend MIA at a time when doing so helped push UA out of MIA.

holding onto a hub strategy from the past for any airline doesn't work including regarding DFW.

DL didn't have the local market share at DFW to make it viable as a hub for DL. Further, from a strategic standpoint, DL's pulldown of DFW laid the groundwork for the repeal of the Wright restrictions which we are now seeing is going to dramatically weaken AA's control of its home hub.

UA has yet to really focus on the hub restructuring that DL did and AA hasn't post merger either. UA's closure of CLE and refocusing LAX on local traffic have both worked based on available data. based on schedule data, it looks like IAD is the next to be trimmed.

As for AA, it is precisely because they have so many RJs - which they can't get out of - that they can't really restructure their hubs - and that is compounded by the fact that they are still using two res systems and two revenue mgmt. systems so their hubs are not linked together. thus a single res system will come first but eventually, AA will have to get rid of some of its duplicate hubs.

thus, the fact that DL has finished its rationalization of its network post merger but AA and UA isn't is no reason to think that DL has done something that other carriers will not.

and there are plenty of people here who are pretty emotional about PIT which is just as bare as CVG inside a fairly nice looking terminal.




 

IOW, you don't really care about being rational or logical because you personally have been harmed by DL's strategic actions from the past, can't get over it, and will finish your career at DL and then some nursing ill will because of DFW.

rarely do people on here post for any length of time before their real motives become apparent.

I'm sorry you were negatively impacted by DL's decision to close DFW. there are plenty of people who cram onto the few remaining seats whenever they can get them to get on flights to ATL. you are hardly alone.

the past is over.

move on. If your mother didn't or wouldn't tell you to do it, then you shouldn't be surprised that you run into people on the internet that will tell you what you should do.

until then, every post you write about how DL has treated you are colored with the same perspective.
Lol it is tooooo funny to sit here ant watch you talk out of your ass and have not the smallest of clues what you are talking about. 
 
Closing DFW and TPA had nothing to do with me personally. I had a enough time during bk that I didn't even bump down to an ASM. All that happened was I probably wouldn't have been able to keep weekends off if I wanted to go to day shift. I had said this many times. 
 
Born in raised in Georgia. Never left and wont ever leave. 
 
But the issue here is 
1) you can't read. This isn't about "holding on" as I have pointed out at least 100 times. Its about not constantly blowing smoke up peoples asses. Its about true comparisons and being fair. You wouldn't understand any of that though
2) I complain about outsourcing, the 5th week and many other things that don't have a single thing to do with me because I am not an ass hole. You have already proved that you could not give a single crap about Delta's employees and that we are just a stat in your quest to win the internet battle with the other fools who use employees as just a number. Standing up for all the cuts in BK and during the merger but specifically point out that 7.5 was bad BECAUSE AND ONLY BECAUSE IT EFFECTED YOU means you are, exactly what I have said you are. As long as YOU get YOURS then f**k the rest of us.
That attitude does nothing but hurt the employees at Delta Air Lines and the employees in the airline industry world wide. Its a big reason why the industry is still in the toilet for labor today.  
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top