olderguyAMT
Advanced
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2010
- Messages
- 238
- Reaction score
- 41
The one lesson we should have learned by now is that the Negotiating Committee should not have sole decision making when voting for a T/A.
I would reccommend local bylaw changes to reflect 2 things:
1- The president or representative at negotiations must consult with the local board before voting on a T/A
2- Recall of Local Officers (check and balances)
Negotiation Committee bylaw change:
1- Negotiation committee will not vote on T/A until fuill text language has been reviewed by the Negotiations committee and their local Boards.
2- Once a vote is made by the Negotiation Committee, Any changes made to the T/A (including language) must be
revoted by the Committee regardless of content.
Makes sense doesn't it?
Yes, it all makes perfect sense, and we need more leaders that think like that. We need more checks and ballances.
When could those changes happen, and how?
Something else that would be useful, would be for all the VP's of all locals to publicly reject the TA as it is currently written. They could write a letter similar to the MacTierman Letter.
If we knew how they stand on the issues, it would be easier to vote for the right candidate.
For the Yes Voters, a candidate could spell out what they like about the issues. and the same for the No Voters. Then there would be a paper trail to hold them accountable, too. If they get wishy-washy and want to flip-flop we will know it.