A320 Driver
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Messages
- 3,358
- Reaction score
- 2,319
So, you wouldn't take a Nic contract if your pay went to $500k a year?
Uh, $500K? Where do we sign? But the Kirby ain't gonna get it done.
Driver...
So, you wouldn't take a Nic contract if your pay went to $500k a year?
Someone around here finally demonstrates they understand things. Well said. PI, pay attention to the above post and read it a couple times to make sure it sinks in.
USAPA is basically checkmated. Just because you don't like an arbitration award does not give you a "legitimate union purpose". Game over. It's funny to see the regular clowns on here proclaim otherwise.
Uh, $500K? Where do we sign? But the Kirby ain't gonna get it done.
Driver...
Of course I would take the 500k! Then I would sue USAPA and LCC (Addington II) and win, regain my rightful place on the seniority list and watch PI swing gear for me. That's where he belongs anyway since he was highly inexperienced when "hired" ah hem, at Piedmont in the first place. (Thanks Dad!)
"Jane, you ignorant slut" comes to mind. Old enough to remember that?
Prechilil, you ignorant slut.
When you can hold a candle to me, step right up. What do you say 924PS?
See east? That was as stupid as your reply. Lets both try harder.
Now we're talking! LOL
So, tell us again how you got the job at Piedmont. Did you drop trou or was it your old man???
Now you went and got Move all upset again.Stay out of this boo. I don't want to read your god damn dissertations that would inevitably follow
The first is whether or not the TA, and by default the product of the process defined in the TA for determining an integrated seniority list is binding on USAPA. Both judge Wake and Silver have unquestionably stated that the TA and Nicolau award are, as a matter of law, binding on USAPA as the successor to ALPA.
The second question, now that we have determined that the Nicolau is intact as the accepted integrated system seniority list for LCC, is whether USAPA can negotiate for something other than the Nicolau. Yes they can. They can negotiate all aspects of the collective bargaining agreement. This is where a legitimate union purpose must be demonstrated as defined by Rakestraw. But it does not negate that the Nicolau award is binding on the union. If it were not binding then there would be no requirement to demonstrate a Legitimate Union Objective in bargaining for a SLI other than the Nicolau. And the Nicolau award would not be used as a measuring tool to evaluate an alternative proposal.
In a M/B arbitration scenario the company is a party to the negotiations. If there has not been a successful negotiation to modify the accepted integrated system seniority list for LCC (the Nicolau award), by what authority does the union advance a different seniority list since a ratified JCBA would be in place prior to a M/B arbitration and negotiations are over?
Which was the most appropriate AWA methodology?
Just because you don't like a course of action the union is pursuing doesn't mean they don't have a legitimate union purpose.
Prechilil, you ignorant slut.
When you can hold a candle to me, step right up. What do you say 924PS?
Some of the finest pilots and nicest people at USAirways came from airline families. Pi Brat happens to be one of those guys and was one of the best pilots and first officers I had the privilege of flying with.
Someone who has grown up in a airline environment and works his/her way through the ranks has a unique appreciation of the industry. Wish we had more.....