Indeed. The saddest and most treatment-resistent cases in lunatic asylums couldn't generally even begin to make such stuff up....
OCT/NOV 2012 US Pilots Labor Discussion
- Thread starter Admin
- Start date
- Status
Indeed. The saddest and most treatment-resistent cases in lunatic asylums couldn't generally even begin to make such stuff up....
Pretty much...but it is not give me the Nic or else....
It is more like willingly accept the Nic, and make minor restitution....or be force fed the Nic with the penalties of forming a rogue union that has failed its DFR.
How much were the TWA pilots awarded from ALPA? Better yet, and what will be a huge question is,,,,do certain founding individuals hold any personal liability for conducting fraudulent practices when promoting a representational election?
If I were Bradford et al....I would be pushing hard for Nic implementation.
Whew! Just when I'd thought I'd already seen the highest imaginable, apogee point for even the wildest-even-possible entitlement fantasies!....truly....words just fail to serve here....
"...or be force fed the Nic.." Umm...yeah....no doubt...anything you say nic....
"If I were Bradford et al....I would be pushing hard for Nic implementation" Well, by your laughably inconsistent "logic"; why should they even think about it at all?...Given that the nic will unquestionably be "force fed" anyway...? 😉
"How much were the TWA pilots awarded from ALPA?" Gasp!....You simply can NOT be even at all now suggesting that alpa could screw things up in any aspect of seniority matters? 🙂
Enough sorry chuckles for now, but I must honestly note that if what you generally post here accurately reflects the apparently random, squirming and slithering within the lately overheated little cauldron that apparently is your mind..then you do have my honest sympathy.
Take a breath, realize that this is just a labor squabble that will eventually end, and have some fun for a change! Life's too short....etc.
I'm not surprised that "thot" went over your head since you're too dumb to text.
breeze
Overtaken by events...maybe..but,,
Threeway...highly unlikely....how does the West get seperate representation fom usapa, and if the West has seperate rep...is usapa then guilty at that point of not representing the West? Further, what if say DCA then demands sepereate reps, to protect their intereset, and the TWA pilots sue to get seperate repst to look out for their interest? A 3 way causes huge problems.
So, the overtaking will mean Nic and the AMR list combined in a "fair and equitable manner" as per AM and MB.
Also, I am sure you were right about fencing and the AMR 777 captain, the point was that DOH is an absolute no go in an LCC/AMR merger (fencing included) and east poster's BS about the legitimacy of DOH at LCC an in regard to the ramifications of the nic are just that BS.
They should be concerned because as dual unionist using ALPA resources to promote and found a new union that their legal counsel told them would be considered illegal, might just hold personal financial consequences, or worse.
Well...you had best get to suing them immediately then, if not sooner. Why haven't you done so?
Have the best day possible. 🙂
L
luvn737s
Guest
If the Nic was an illegitimate list, then there might be some rational basis for a do-over. Other than the subjective opinion of a windfall, or the admission that it's the only thing that will placate the majority enough to be ratified, why do you think the east should be permitted to jettison their responsibility to follow through with implementing the arbitrated award?
A320 Driver
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Messages
- 3,358
- Reaction score
- 2,319
Because it blows?
Why do you keep telling the East to accept, embrace, and roll out the red carpet for the NIC? Is it because, in spite of the millions you've spent trying to force it, you have been unable to do so using every legal avenue available to you? It certainly appears that way.
We'll have to wait and see what USAPA puts up as an integration proposal knowing that it will have to be defended in court. Of course that also means the NIC has to be defended since that is the slide rule Marty will use to judge the other proposal by. You've lost the case of trying to impose it. Now you will have to see both integration methods on trial before a judge and jury. I'm sure that is exactly what you DON'T want, but that is where this is headed.
BTW, I am not in favor of either a do over or a three way at this point. It's gone on too long. Let's put two seniority methods on trial and see which one prevails.
Driver...
I will keep my position in hopes that it is to your detriment. That's the point. You fools always resort to namecalling when you know you're wrong. That's a tell.
I remember now. You're the guy who used his daugher and her illness in some squabble a while ago. Now her innocent picture is your avatar when you post nonsense like this. You really should be ashamed of yourself. Pathetic.
I think I saw you in Philly the other day. A rumpled, deranged looking old captain walking through the terminal shaking his head back and forth. No kidding.
Just like your all or nothing give me DOH or else. Tell me, oh wise one, just how we will ever find "middle ground" when DOH is clearly the centerpiece of your "union's" constitution and bylaws. To the easthole contingent middle ground is the west pilots rolling over and giving up. Thus, our "take no prisoners" mentality. We aren't giving up. Deal with it.
Sure. Makes about as much sense of the easthole mantra of "conditions and restrictions".
The AWA 3 month new-hire was at the bottom 99% on our list. The east person with 17 years of unbroken service was the bottom guy on the US Airways list, bottom 100%.
So..... what's the issue here?
PS: currently the AWA guy is on the street and the US airways guy is a E190 captain. - - - but we AWA guys are stealing your jobs. Right!
- Status
