Birdman you are 100% correct. AMFA does have open nego. and has one of the best communications avenue to the members. I personally have sat-in many negotiations. AMFA does in fact take all suggestions from the observers during caucusses. And in fact applies them to the company thru negotiations and the company has no idea it came from the observers. We have items in our contract that actually came from observers, wow, go figure, thats how participation works at AMFA.
Whoop-Whoop you are laso correct. Why the UAL boys went from AMFA to the teamsters is beyond me. However, from what the guys are saying now is that the teamsters promiced all kinds of stuff, but once again, after they got in there nothing has materialized, typical teamsters. If you guys were still AMFA this topic would'nt even exist, because you all would have known before the company did what was being offered AND what the company was countering. This is what is so great about AMFA COMMUNICATION...
When you have to beg your union about the offers; it's time to get rid of them and get AMFA back in. The teamsters are trying to get back in at SWA but all their goons that are showing up to peoples houses to drum up business are leaving with their tails between their legs. We are much, much more happier with AMFA here, too bad you guys didn't stay AMFA, cuz you guys would be more than informed-you all would have known exacally what all the offers were gonna be for all articles prior to starting negotiations. Sorry but i blame the membership at UAL for believing the teamsters and voting them in. Shudda stayed AMFA boys!!!