ableoneable
Veteran
- Joined
- May 6, 2007
- Messages
- 711
- Reaction score
- 0
Oh no. You called me a scab, not the moderators. I simply responded with a slur.
My point is that I did not object to your slur yet you asked me what I found objectionable about your intensely witty alteration of AWAPPA.
One of the accepted definitions of scab is one who seeks to displace another from employment
USAPA's DOH/LOH scheme seeks to furlough pilots who were employed at the time of the merger and replace them with pilots who were on the street.
The logic behind this arrangement is that your furloughees "paid their dues" or "sacrificed themselves on the USAir alter" etc etc. The fact that east furloughees had worked and accrued, not earned, seniority at a company that no longer exists has no bearing on the current situation.
When the furloughs are completed in March 2009 we will be in this situation. Now USAPA's apologists claim that this is not USAPA's doing but merely an unfortunate circumstance. They fail to aknoledge, however, that this is exactly the outcome that USAPA wishes to achieve. One only needs understand what USAPA has always meant when they have said they seek "furlough protection" for the east pilots.
This is a cute way of saying; "We (USAPA protector of the east) wish to protect our pilots and keep them employed while we send west pilots who were employed at the time of the merger to the street and transfer their jobs to our pilots. i.e. Scabbing.