Pacemaker
Senior
- Sep 3, 2002
- 475
- 0
Rumor has it the first question to Lee was about 'Final and Binding'.....
Gee, you mean "Final and Binding" might actually mean what is says?
US Pilots labor Discussion 12/4-
- Thread starter Edward
- Start date
- Status
Gee, you mean "Final and Binding" might actually mean what is says?
It is my understanding, Hemenway and company lawyers were also in attendance.
Metroyet
Veteran
- Nov 1, 2008
- 2,571
- 5,664
aquagreen73s
Veteran
- Aug 22, 2005
- 1,979
- 1,877
The true message underlying this whole debacle is that all of us are seeing first hand why this country has survived for two hundred and some odd years. Despite all the absolute stupidity and treachery out there, we have a system of justice that often times gets it right. In too many other parts of the world, the three part video would be the rule of law. Ergo, there's no shortage of bananna republics in this world.Shocking. I guess the Judges haven't seen the brilliant "3 part series".
OTTER574
Veteran
- Jan 11, 2009
- 632
- 422
No worries.
Truth, Honesty and Simple Contract Law TRUMPS lee seham, bradford, cleary, mowery and the rest of the current and corrupt usapa gang.
It's getting mighty expensive for my family and I, but thank god we'll have a FEDERAL COURT OF LAW to fix that very soon.
Best_Guess
Member
- Oct 8, 2007
- 23
- 0
Oh Please, The Patriotic analogy is too much.
Seham's points are either right or they are not. That is what the
judges will decide, and in either case one of us will deem it just and the other unjust.
"gets it right" is in the eye of the 'getter'.
L
luvn737s
Guest
Do you suppose that judges view Seham the way the pilot population views the Napping Northwesters?
OTTER574
Veteran
- Jan 11, 2009
- 632
- 422
Documents that my council and I have show that lee seham, bradford, cleary, mowery and current usapa leaders are liable for DAMAGES.
GOOD LUCK
aquagreen73s
Veteran
- Aug 22, 2005
- 1,979
- 1,877
You apparently don't understand the fundamental reason this case is being litigated - equity. There is no moral equivalence at play here, otherwise we wouldn't be litigating. This isn't a narrow debate about the legality of a tax deduction or whether the cops had probable cause to arrest, rather it's about a union's duty to fairly represent all of its members. Seham all along has tried to make this a narrow legal question, and that's why he's failing miserably now. DFR's are all about a broad principle of fairly representing its members and an analysis of this turns on the facts of the case. Fair representation is about as easy to define as obscenity. The courts aren't going to leave it up to a subjective opinion of one individual to define what is obscene and what isn't. Likewise, there is no technicality for Seham to win on. DFR is what the judges say it is based on the facts of each case. Seham's idea of fairness is going to carry no more weight than, say, Larry Flynt's idea of what constitutes obscenity.
CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Nov 13, 2009
- 1,920
- 1,961
No - justice, morality and integrity are not situational. They are the same for all time and for all people. It's the moral law of the Universe which was established at creation. C.S. Lewis in Mere Christianity demonstrated the existence of this law that has been recognized by all civilizations throughout history. The court system often fails to provide for true justice primarily when it ignores the moral law and tries to make matters situational.
Interestingly "final and binding" means connotatively exactly the same thing as it means denotatively. Does anyone really expect an impartial court of justice to come to a different conclusion on such a simple concept?
Otter,
Lurking for a year, then 2 post in short order? Thanks for speaking up. Hopefully, we will be able to get our fees back, and usapa can pay for all the litigation, including the damages trial.
Since we were talking who was in attendace, beside Bradford, the whole FPL crowd of Cleary,Mowery,King,Theruer,and Davidson. east lawyers, seham,Granth,Middlebrook and another. West team and a gallery.
L
luvn737s
Guest
Commentary on Sehams performance beofre the 9th Circuit:
Even the pooch said, " You call that a scroon?"
Even the pooch said, " You call that a scroon?"
CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Nov 13, 2009
- 1,920
- 1,961
Perhaps the 9th Circuit can hold Seham in contempt of court until he properly elucidates the meaning of final and binding.
OTTER574
Veteran
- Jan 11, 2009
- 632
- 422
Coming from a rural, farm background leads another way to say that is....THIS DOG "usapa" WON'T HUNT!
exB717Flyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 1,106
- 599
Eagerly awaiting the legal update from the USAPA spin machine. More" supreme confidence", perhaps?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
