What's new

US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's spot on Pi. Calm down.

You guys are like a bunch of sharks........a little blood in the water and your nothing less than orgasmic......

After all, you should have had the left seat in the 330 about 3 yrs ago......

yeah, yeah.....that's the ticket!!! what else can you get away with???
 
You guys are like a bunch of sharks........a little blood in the water and your nothing less than orgasmic......

Would that be the easties who had people guilty and facing jail time before any investigation was complete? Or are you a member of the Pi club who believes others are worse than any eastie.

Jim
 
Would that be the easties who had people guilty and facing jail time before any investigation was complete? Or are you a member of the Pi club who believes others are worse than any eastie.

Jim

From what I have read, the company was unable to tie anything to any kind of USAPA work slowdown and the judge hasn't issued his ruling yet. So, who says they have undisputed facts? USAirways? again, we await the judge to clear the muddy waters.

As far as ID theft......that is a more personal issue, so tempers are going to flare. That investigation is still ongoing.

So, the sharks are let loose. Nobody has answers yet.
 
As far as ID theft......that is a more personal issue, so tempers are going to flare. That investigation is still ongoing.

So, the sharks are let loose. Nobody has answers yet.

Now those are true statements (except you also referred to "theft" which is unproven as far as I know).

Jim
 
From what I have read, the company was unable to tie anything to any kind of USAPA work slowdown and the judge hasn't issued his ruling yet. So, who says they have undisputed facts? USAirways? again, we await the judge to clear the muddy waters.

As far as ID theft......that is a more personal issue, so tempers are going to flare. That investigation is still ongoing.

So, the sharks are let loose. Nobody has answers yet.
The injunction is being written and should be our soon after Labor Day. The company did a great job proving USAPAs slow down and USAPAs lawyer did a great job helping Cleary incriminate USAPA.

Its all in the transcripts.

As for ID theft - never happened. Not one LEA has gotten involved.
 
The injunction is being written and should be our soon after Labor Day. The company did a great job proving USAPAs slow down and USAPAs lawyer did a great job helping Cleary incriminate USAPA.

Its all in the transcripts.

As for ID theft - never happened. Not one LEA has gotten involved.

reading that crystal ball you have in your rectum again? Or is this just your opinion?
 
You guys are like a bunch of sharks........a little blood in the water and your nothing less than orgasmic......

After all, you should have had the left seat in the 330 about 3 yrs ago......

yeah, yeah.....that's the ticket!!! what else can you get away with???
You can have your 330s. I want that 320 Capt seat out of CLT.
 
You can have your 330s. I want that 320 Capt seat out of CLT.


LOL!

Well, I just want a left seat in the 757 in PHX.....but realistically know that that dream is out of reach for whatever reasons....I will just shoot for the 767 left seat in the east, just to have a better quality of life in the long run.
 
What's amazing or untruthful about this? The FBI isn't going to come in and evaluatie the east operations to determine facts and illegal conduct. It's up to the company to gather and present facts which they did. How blind or biased would the judge have to be to not concur that the status quo condition has changed? Logically, what would the company gain from fabricating these claims and data? The JCBA isn't going anywhere as long as USAPA refuses the NIC so why claim a slowdown exists and spend millions on a law suit that gains them nothing? Even if the company gets the injunction they may not get damages, so that's a lot of money and effort to return ops to where they already (if you believe no job action is going on). The facts are clear, it's just a matter of time now.

The company made a statement in its corporate news publication that I don't believe a reputable publication would. I'm not talking about what they said in court. The fact is, as of today the union nor it's pilots have been found guilty of an illegal job action, and as God as my wittness I am not guilty of a Job action and anyone that says I am is wrong. Yet, after reading the company's claims, other employees have accused me of just that while I was doing my job and doing it well.
 
You're talking about the easties - judge, jury, and executioner. The company went to a real judge to get a ruling, or are you denying that too?

Now, I've asked you a number of questions and you haven't answered a single one. What's the matter? Afraid the answers will expose you for a fraud?

Jim

PS - why don't you educate yourself and go sit in court for awhile. Count the number of times the DA or plaintiffs lawyer uses the word "alledged". You'll find that the answer is zero, yet the judge or jury decides guilt, not the DA or plaintiffs lawyer.

Unlike you, I'm still flying airplanes, so please forgive me that I didn't get right back to you. I had customers to transport safely, comfortably, on time and efficiently. You are the one that doesn't answer, like when you falsely outed someone and you could figure out my post the other day about the IAM strike.

I'm not talking about in court. I'm talking about claims made in US DAILY. I happen to have someone that is a whole lot smarter than both of us that agrees with my assessment.

We had talked about getting together and talking over a coke. Lets do that, I'll buy.
 
It's coming. Injunction is inbound and USAPA was shut out in the LOA93 decision. Call TP-she has the decision.

So, tell me, where did you get this definite LOA93 decision? Apparently you are the only one with the inside tract......as in your rectum tract.

That info is legally withheld until an announcement by both parties, so tell me, how do you know how it turned out? Or are you full of crap?
 
Dense comes to mind....

Yes, the company said that there was an illegal job action going on. And which individual(s) did the company say was/were going to jail? Being terminated? Are you denying that easties were saying that westies were guilty AND going to jail? Before an investigation was complete? Before there were any legal charges? Before a trial? Isn't that exactly what you spoke out against?


Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn now and then. I know you're spring loaded to say someone, anyone is as bad if not worse than your pals but try to learn from the squirrel...

Jim

I never said that the company said anything about jail time or anything else, just that they used the term illegal before anyone was convicted. Just like some east guys did and I spoke up about it.

Now, there were plenty of westicles on here partying and claiming millions of dollars in damages that the company was asking for and how USAPA would be bankrupted, remember that? Probably not since that would be short term memory and heck it was westies anyway and you don't comment on their bad behavior.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top