US Pilots Labor Discussion

[cactusboy53]

How convenient, the mail box area is the same for,

army of lyingitas and reform USAPA.com

Another similar business they have at the same address, they make strange bedfellows.

Urban Bone

Still a TROLL. Hey, why don't you go find a new ID for next week? Need some help for names, I'm sure we could give you a hand.....

 

[apollo]

RUN TIME ERROR X 2: Kind of says it all, don't you think? Troll.

My guess is some one was not "amused" with a publication.

I enjoy reading history, do you?

Revised Meeting Notice
TO: MEC Members
FROM: Jack Stephan, MEC Chairman
DATE: May 4, 2007
SUBJECT: Special MEC Meeting – May 6-7, 2007 -- DCA
In accordance with Article IV, Section 3 D (2) of the ALPA Constitution and By-Laws,
after concerns raised by the MEC with regard to the ramifications of the seniority list
award, MEC Chairman Jack Stephan hereby calls a Special MEC Meeting to commence
Sunday, May 6 at 4:00 p.m. EDT and adjourning on Monday, May 7 at 6:00 p.m. or at
the completion of business. The Special MEC Meeting will be held at the Crowne Plaza,
2200 Centreville Road, Herndon, VA 20170, phone: 703-471-6700.
The agenda for the meeting is a review of the Seniority Integration Opinion and Award
with the Merger Committee and Advisors.

 

[cactusboy53]

This has to seem like years, not six months to them. They will not return.

What? You all of a sudden not only know, but are pals with the three guys? I doubt that seriously. I on the other hand know all three very well and have flown with two of them. All three gentlemen are men of high moral character. I would trust each with my life in a New York second.

Now bantering back and forth with you for the past six months (even with the name changes), truly does seem like YEARS. 😛

If I were to spend six months at home (@ FULL PAY) to reacquaint myself with my family, do some house work / repair, play with the cars, plink around the sky in a two-seater, and get all kinds of other important things done....well, I personally think that the six months would go fast. Carry on, Troll.

 

[traderjake]

This has to seem like years, not six months to them. They will not return.

What does the last 3 years of LOA 93 seem like?

 

[apollo]

What? You all of a sudden not only know, but are pals with the three guys? I doubt that seriously. I on the other hand know all three very well and have flown with two of them. All three gentlemen are men of high moral character. I would trust each with my life in a New York second.

Then I am sure they will not have any problem finding a job then.

 

[traderjake]

Easily understood by Kasher. He has dealt with it many, many times. He doesn't split hairs like you do, to favor one group over another due to a pathological anomaly. He is a seasoned arbitrator.

He sounds a lot like Nicolau.

 

[apollo]

Still a TROLL. Hey, why don't you go find a new ID for next week? Need some help for names, I'm sure we could give you a hand.....

I like history, maybe David, er Davie Crocket would be a good choice.

 

[BoeingBoy]

It is not realistic, nor has anyone ever expected to revert to their former position either.

I definitely agree, but it hasn't been me repeatedly claiming a "very specific definition" for the word freeze in the contract. I presented two specific instances where freeze is used in the contract. You first said one had a different definition since it had no end date and the frozen pension was superseded by a different pension. Fair enough. So I pointed out that the other usage - training freeze - had a specific end date just like the freeze in the pay section of LOA 93. Now you're saying that that use doesn't count either. Having an end date specified apparently doesn't matter, although you've ranted on and on about the meaning of having an end date. Now you're desperately trying to cling to a special meaning of freeze, abandoning the arguments you've used for months. So what is there in LOA 93 that gives the word freeze an unusual definition if having an end date doesn't? Sure, you've come up with a definition that isn't in the contract or LOA 93. But what IN THE CONTRACT OR LOA 93 SAYS THAT?

Spare the bs, the insults, the attacks - just point out where in the contract it specifies the meaning of freeze that you're so desperately clinging to...

Jim

 

[BoeingBoy]

Give me a break, you know darn well the company is still in that position today

Absolutely, and there hasn't been a hybrid DFR filed naming the company and USAPA has there. Until the company does something, without court relief from liability, such a suit would still be unripe.

Is their a statue of limitations on the T/A?

Not in the sense of one specified by law after which a hybrid DFR suit would be too late because of the TA. But practically, the TA will exist until the two groups are combined so a statute of limitations exists in law for a DFR suit (the 9th clarified when the clock starts) which would include a hybrid DFR suit.

Jim

 

[cactusboy53]

I like history, maybe David, er Davie Crocket would be a good choice.

Clever Troll. Anyone can hide behind the skirt of an alias, can't they? Why not King David that slew Goliath? I would say that is one of my VERY favorites.

Let's see if this works: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFsTCeUC8Dk

 

[BoeingBoy]

BOING BOY, What happens when you have nothing but the big "R's" regret, resentment, retired! MM!

You tell me - you have 2 of the 3 but I only have retirement and am enjoying it very much thank you....

Jim

 

[Move2CLT]

This has to seem like years, not six months to them. They will not return.

Yes they will.

 

[Move2CLT]

Then I am sure they will not have any problem finding a job then.

No they won't because they already have jobs. I wonder how many law enforcement agencies followed up on this data breach? Oh ya, it was NONE.

 

[luvthe9]

Yes they will.

And when might that BE? 😉

 

[AWE_SHUCKS]

No they won't because they already have jobs. I wonder how many law enforcement agencies followed up on this data breach? Oh ya, it was NONE.

They suck