What's new

US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Once again, no. And your average posts took a nice jump tonight.


Ok....you got me....I have been posting on here consistantly for the last 3-4 hrs and my average climbed like hell......all the way to 1.65/day.


a far cry from your 23.05/ day.


Like I said, you are a bogus plant......sitting behind a desk somewhere. I had better luck with the fat ladies lying about their sizes on Match.com.

Once again, too weak, DH.

go back to your bean counting and leave us to our own problems......or is that just what you want to interfere with?
 
Ok....you got me....I have been posting on here consistantly for the last 3-4 hrs and my average climbed like hell......all the way to 1.65/day.


a far cry from your 23.05/ day.


Like I said, you are a bogus plant......sitting behind a desk somewhere. I had better luck with the fat ladies lying about their sizes on Match.com.

Once again, too weak, DH.

go back to your bean counting and leave us to our own problems......or is that just what you want to interfere with?

Good night breeze. Don't forget to lock that knife drawer.
 
My guess is he's out on a medical and bored to death. I know there's better therapy than planting yourself on these boards.

I have come to believe that dreaminofclt is either Cleary or a FOC. He knows that if we get union officers that are willing to stop the fighting over every little thing between the pilot groups and actually allow the west to be part of the union, he will lose the next election.

That, or he really is just nuts. A sane west pilot couldn't believe he is helping things with his behavior.
 
I have come to believe that dreaminofclt is either Cleary or a FOC. He knows that if we get union officers that are willing to stop the fighting over every little thing between the pilot groups and actually allow the west to be part of the union, he will lose the next election.

That, or he really is just nuts. A sane west pilot couldn't believe he is helping things with his behavior.
Interesting theory PI and you very well may have nailed it. I'm not sure if it this is the result of a Cleary re-election strategy or just more poo in the zoo, but decorum and self-restraint have certainly been sacrificed. Unfortunately some prefer thermite rather than open dialog with professional disagreements, and we have seen examples of that on both sides. Fortunately the worst offenders tend to disappear almost as fast as they appear, or they move on to a new screen once they go too far even for these mostly un-moderated boards.
 
I have come to believe that dreaminofclt is either Cleary or a FOC. He knows that if we get union officers that are willing to stop the fighting over every little thing between the pilot groups and actually allow the west to be part of the union, he will lose the next election.

That, or he really is just nuts. A sane west pilot couldn't believe he is helping things with his behavior.
I am truley an amazing poster. Not only have you pegged me as management, but now I'm also Cleary! I need to give myself a pat on the back. I've got you easties chasing all sorts of shadows.

If I had known I could mess with the east like this I would have started posting years ago.
 
Interesting theory PI and you very well may have nailed it. I'm not sure if it this is the result of a Cleary re-election strategy or just more poo in the zoo, but decorum and self-restraint have certainly been sacrificed. Unfortunately some prefer thermite rather than open dialog with professional disagreements, and we have seen examples of that on both sides. Fortunately the worst offenders tend to disappear almost as fast as they appear, or they move on to a new screen once they go too far even for these mostly un-moderated boards.
Open dialog, really? What are you hoping to accomplish? Do you want compromise on the Nic? Is that where your open dialog is going to go?

Just because I don't believe in your Jesus crap doesn't mean I lack decorum. I threaten the east because I challenge their views on work issues. I threaten you because I challenge your beliefs.
 
Open dialog, really? What are you hoping to accomplish? Do you want compromise on the Nic? Is that where your open dialog is going to go?

Just because I don't believe in your Jesus crap doesn't mean I lack decorum. I threaten the east because I challenge their views on work issues. I threaten you because I challenge your beliefs.

Move,
You are legendary in your mind ONLY! You threaten no one little man. Get over it. Reading your post are like rubber necking at car accidents.....nothing more.
FA
 
Open dialog, really? What are you hoping to accomplish? Do you want compromise on the Nic? Is that where your open dialog is going to go?

Just because I don't believe in your Jesus crap doesn't mean I lack decorum. I threaten the east because I challenge their views on work issues. I threaten you because I challenge your beliefs.
What am I hoping to accomplish? I want to get any useful information that comes from participating in these boards. It's kind of a one-stop shop for seeing links and responses to court filings, news articles and sometimes inside information that pops up here before it does anyplace else. So my first order of business is information gathering.

My second order of business is to post when I think I can contribute to the discussion by using facts, logic and reason wherever possible. I don't get everything right and have accepted correction whenever someone points out an error or unintentional misstatement I may have made. Perhaps some are persuaded by the things I have posted, but I certainly don't kid myself into thinking that there are very many open minds populating these boards. I have even made a few attempts at being humorous just to give myself a laugh, but those comments are all-too-often taken the wrong way so I have decided to stop trying to do the humor thing.

I have made multiple conjectures and speculations about the integrity, morality and conduct of USAPA leaders and zealous followers, but have tried to back those up with a logical or rational basis for saying that the east pilots don't really want a JCBA because they know it will contain the NIC or that some are unquestionably responsible for engaging in an illegal work action. I can't prove such claims as fact, but I tend to think any reasonable person would agree that my approach is valid. When questioned, I try to give a full and complete response of why I believe what I believe.

I try, and all the more so as of late, to not attack another poster personally. I'm certainly willing to point out a flaw in their argument or challenge them to prove with facts or logic some claim that is being made (like the airline will be split up in a matter of days). I find such talk unintentionally humorous, just like when people claim to know what Doug Parker is thinking or feeling on a personal level. Those kinds of things are just too preposterous to pass up.

So what's your motivation and self-assessment? Do you believe you generally show respect for other posters viewpoints or would you classify you communications as often containing attacks and vitriol that would get you kicked out of a company meeting or a public meeting where a certain minimum level of professional decorum is expected?

BTW, you don't threaten my beliefs in the slightest. I couldn't possibly be happier or more content with where I am in life and in my beliefs. There wasn't even the smallest seed of doubt in my mind before our exchange and there certainly is any now.

A self-regulated discussion board requires personal responsibility and a respect for others to not let it degrade into a cesspool. Are you intelligent enough to get you point across without personal attacks and vitriol? You would have my full support on the pilot debate if you can.
 
I am truley an amazing poster. Not only have you pegged me as management, but now I'm also Cleary! I need to give myself a pat on the back. I've got you easties chasing all sorts of shadows.

If I had known I could mess with the east like this I would have started posting years ago.

Maybe a truley amazing, whatever that is!

No, I didn't peg you as management, I believe that was breeze. Another has you pegged as an old legendary ALPA board ahole, and I see the same traits. I put you as Cleary or FOC, or nuts. Clear?
 
Interesting theory PI and you very well may have nailed it. I'm not sure if it this is the result of a Cleary re-election strategy or just more poo in the zoo, but decorum and self-restraint have certainly been sacrificed. Unfortunately some prefer thermite rather than open dialog with professional disagreements, and we have seen examples of that on both sides. Fortunately the worst offenders tend to disappear almost as fast as they appear, or they move on to a new screen once they go too far even for these mostly un-moderated boards.

I agree and I hate to say that I have at times returned the grenades. That doesn't help anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top