USA320Pilot
Veteran
- Joined
- May 18, 2003
- Messages
- 8,175
- Reaction score
- 1,539
You are getting your guys mixed up. That wasn't me asking that, I asked if you supported USAPA, back when you were giving ethics lessons. Let's look at a post from 2007 from a USA320, and I'm assuming you are the same one:
"USA320Pilot
Posted 13 September 2007 - 12:27 AM
Veteran
PipPipPipPipPip
Group: Registered Member
Posts: 7,326
Joined: 18-May 03
Junebug & AWA320,
It is my understanding you are in for some big surprises in the not-to-distant future and John Prater just told a colleague of mine that his goal is to get both sides to the table and if they didnt work together to "let them stew in their juices".
Furthermore, USAPA now has about 2,400 cards. On September 17 the next furlough recall class will commence and USAPA will know from sources at the CLT Training Center exactly who will return to the company and who will not. The last furlough recall class will be held in a couple of weeks and then USAPA will know exactly which representational cards are valid and which ones would be voided.
When the number of cards is compared to the combined seniority list (with an exact/certified US Airways - AWA pilot list obtained from George Nicolau's Award), USAPA will know exactly how many cards are necessary to to have the NMB order an election. Therefore, the Company's recall timing is perfect and welcome news to USAPA''s Officer's.
By the way, if you would like to print an authoirization card click here.
By the way, I'm sure you're wondering if electing a new bargaining agent enhance our ability to redress the inequities of the Nicolau award?
Well, I understand the Nicolau Award is the product of an ALPA-mandated process and ALPA is bound to defend that process. The ALPA-US Airways MEC cannot prevail in its current litigation because it voluntarily submitted to the ALPA-mandated process. The USAPA, however, is not bound by ALPA's Constitution and cannot be subjected to ALPA’s political control. USAPA will assert its right under the Railway Labor Act to negotiate over the terms of any seniority integration. Under the RLA, seniority is a mandatory subject of bargaining.
By the way, did you see this letter?
I know, I know, you're going to threaten a DFR lawsuit and I say go ahead. As you know Lee Seham indicated believes your new/pending union, USAPA, has a federally protected right under the RLA to change union representatives. A successor union, such as the USAPA, has the legal right to negotiate changes in the terms and conditions of employment, including seniority. Federal courts have routinely upheld a union’s right to address seniority issues within a wide range of reasonableness.
Finally, I understand USAP nees 50% +1 of the total pilot voting population to force an election. The NMB will determine the pool of eligible pilot-voters from which this number is derived. This number includes, all active pilots East and West, furloughed pilots not working for another airline, pilots on medical leave and LOA or military leave. The MDA pilots and J4J pilots may or may not be included, that will be determined by the NMB - therefore it is critical that MDA and J4J pilots submit Authorization Cards.
Regards,
USA320Pilot"
So what happened to your ethics meter between then and now. And please, please share with us who you are voting for.
Regards,
pi brat
I have said over-and-over again I made a mistake supporting USAPA. But, the UELs never provide all of the information and twist a story to support their argument. Once I read Mike Abram's letter written to every US Airways pilot I knew USAPA was an enormous mistake, which has clearly been identified. I believed Steve Bradford after flying with him for 10 hours back and for the to SFO and he was wrong. Do I believe the Nicolau Award is unfair to east pilots? Yes, but a deal is a deal.
Here's the bottom line:
1. I believe Judge Silver will order USAPA to implement the Nicolau Award.
2. The case is "ripe" and the Ninth Circuit will not hear the case, which will affirm Judge Silver's decision in a a couple of months.
3. The East anti-USAPA pilots, the 3rd listers, and USAPA PHX-based pilots will take control of the union, either during this election or in fairly short-order. At that point the Nicolau Award will be implemented because USAPA has taught us the majority can impose their will on the minority.
Lets not forget that following the release of Nicolau Award II the MEC contracted ALPA Consultant and computer programer Rikk Salamatt to provided an economic and seniority integration analysis. Salamatt produced a report, which the Merger Committee broke down into two parts: confidential and non-confidential sections.
The confidential section was not released to the pilot group because the MEC, the Merger Committee, and Merger General Counsel believed this portion of the report would damage the MEC's case to have the Nicolau Award thrown out in D.C. Superior Court.
The non-confidential portion was used in the MEC's presentation to ALPA's Executive Council.
The non-confidential section indicated any pilot on the property at the time of the merger who could check out had a two-year upgrade delay. Why? Because the AWA pilots were bringing 142 Group II aircraft and above to the merger.
The lowest seniority pilot who had a two-year upgrade delay from 2015-2017 was Jim Ziegler (Joe Monda and Ralph Conrad were too old to check out and their career expectation was a F/O.
The Excel spreadsheet showing Ziegler's two-year upgrade delay can be viewed by clicking here.
However, this data was based on the age 60 mandatory retirement age, which was changed, and added 5 years to upgrades.
Regardless, at the time the Nicolau Award was released Salamtt concluded any pilot not furloughed would have a maximum 2-year upgrade delay with hundreds and hundreds of east pilots sustaining less than a 2-year upgrade delay.
To view an excellent analysis of Salamatt's report and how the Nicolau Award effects east pilots click here.
