mike33
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2007
- Messages
- 2,252
- Reaction score
- 1,128
That is so weak but apprapoe. Obviously that is not a truth....right?AANOTOK said:I did and he said ask 700W...
That is so weak but apprapoe. Obviously that is not a truth....right?AANOTOK said:I did and he said ask 700W...
Just more BS. I"m tired of meetings. It's past time. They simply are not prepared yet. Disappointing indeed.Exactly why are they meeting? To discuss the hold up? To give a date as to when they will approach AA? To discuss the differences that need to be ironed out?...do tell!
well what did he say?AANOTOK said:I did and he said ask 700W...
I don't recall exactly, something about "armchair quarterbacks".dfw gen said:well what did he say?
he said because AANOTOC had never served on a neg committee he didn't know what the hell he was talking aboutdfw gen said:well what did he say?
That's it, now it's all coming back to me...cltrat said:he said because AANOTOC had never served on a neg committee he didn't know what the hell he was talking about
.So he should know his role and blindly follow.
You know this how exactly? Please share the information that you have regarding the NC not being prepared.Tim Nelson said:Just more BS. I"m tired of meetings. It's past time. They simply are not prepared yet. Disappointing indeed.
regards,
I'm just going by the official updates. I mean if you have some information from the Union Bosses or their shills to share with us that supports your statements that they are prepared now, then please share.You know this how exactly? Please share the information that you have regarding the NC not being prepared.
So GS told you that negotiations are scheduled in December? That's great!It seems some of you want the Association to rush to an agreement that cld possibly be a real ual typ f..k up deal i was told recently by phl based agc that negotiations are supposed to begin by early December
You are naive if you dont think there is some dissention amongst the negotiators. The proof is they are not at the tablepjirish317 said:Tim,
Exactly who isn't getting along? Is it MTC or Fleet? All this squabbling chatter from you only means one thing. You are going to make yet another failed attempt to run for office in 2016, and this is your way of setting up the "I can save you if I'm your AGC" mantra. Please spare us. If you have proof that there is dissention among the NC then please share it. Oh wait, you have proof but it for your eyes only, double top secret stuff you can't share with the regular Joe's on this forum, but in time we will see. Is that it? You alway have "proof" but never share it, you always are "in the know", when in actuality you were wrong almost all of the time with regards to LUS information, come on. When will you stop with the "I know more than you" and just give it a rest? I, personally would rather our NC take their time and get it right, rather than rush into JCBA talks, and potentially miss some pretty important stuff for its members. I hope you get crushed again next year, maybe then you will realize that the members do not want you as an AGC and stop already, we have already told you twice via elections but you still just can't grasp that WE DON'T WANT YOU REPRESENTING US!
Regards