What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Claxon said:
Watch the 9th circuit court video, the Honorable Judge Bybee informed marty that all they could do for him is provide a rhetorical club, marty agreed with their assessment, they gave him that. 
 
Three lists.  No APA and USAPA interference.  Fair and equitable per MB laws.
 
You should have thought of fair and equitable before you found yourself in a bind.
 
Should have taken binding arbitration when it was offered.
 
You'd found yourself in less of a bind.
 
 
snapthis said:
 
You should have thought of fair and equitable before you found yourself in a bind.
 
Should have taken binding arbitration when it was offered.
 
You'd found yourself in less of a bind.
 
 
Reality Check: You're still stuck in PHX. Just how is anyone else anywhere thusly in any "bind"?
 
Claxon said:
Watch the 9th circuit court video, the Honorable Judge Bybee informed marty that all they could do for him is provide a rhetorical club, marty agreed with their assessment, they gave him that. 
 
....... Fair and equitable per MB laws.
 
Duh....your merger committee just pulled out of that deal.
 
Man you guys are dense.  You got the same injunction Wake ordered years ago.  
 
Does not matter how long you delay.  Final and binding is FINAL and BINDING.
 
Your problem now is the company is going to use the Nic at LUS for all future bids, so delay does not do a dam thing for ya.
 
snapthis said:
 
You should have thought of fair and equitable before you found yourself in a bind.
 
Should have taken binding arbitration when it was offered.
 
You'd found yourself in less of a bind.
 
BOHICA
 
nic4us said:
Man you guys are dense.  You got the same injunction Wake ordered years ago. 
 
Do try and take even a moment to actually THINK about what you just said...especially the part about "the same injunction" and "years ago". 😉
 
"Man you guys are dense." Umm...Ok then, if you say so. 🙂
 
traderjake said:
 
Another prediction?
 
LMAO
 
Here's my prediction: the APA arbitration satisfies the requirements of the MB legislation.
 
The fact that USAPA chooses not to participate doesn't mean MB isn't being followed.
 
 
You could be correct.  Or not.   😀  Let see what the panel does pursuant to the Protocol Agreement and the authorities delegated to it pursuant to MB and the ground rules.  
 
A cursory reading of the Wilder letter and the Bradford letter would be a mistake.  
 
nic4us said:
 
Duh....your merger committee just pulled out of that deal.
 
Man you guys are dense.  You got the same injunction Wake ordered years ago.  
 
Does not matter how long you delay.  Final and binding is FINAL and BINDING.
 
Your problem now is the company is going to use the Nic at LUS for all future bids, so delay does not do a dam thing for ya.
I honestly advise you to call the employee assistant program.  They will help, I mean it.
 
Claxon said:
I do not believe that was in the 9th remedy.  Could you be so kind to provide a remedy quote ruling, regarding your quote please?  (rhetorical question)
 
Wait til Silver gets done writing!!  The 9th found usapa failed its dfr by, among other things, inclusion of 10h.  That paragraph of the MOU is void by inference.  It is the third rail of the MOU and the company will no longer touch it!
 
EastUS1 said:
 
Do try and take even a moment to actually THINK about what you just said...especially the part about "the same injunction" and "years ago". 😉
 
"Man you guys are dense." Umm...Ok then, if you say so. 🙂
 
Having a tough night princess?  Drink some more, I'm enjoying watching your latest mental breakdown.  I will hand it to you, no one can beat you in a challenge for stupidity, thin skinned whining, and melting down. 
 
Keep dancing for us, it is great entertainment!
 
Monkee said:
 
Having a tough night princess?  Drink some more, I'm enjoying watching your latest mental breakdown.  I will hand it to you, no one can beat you in a challenge for stupidity, thin skinned whining, and melting down. 
 
Keep dancing for us, it is great entertainment!
 
Whew! Personal issues too many to immediately address evidenced there. Why even include the phrase "I will hand it to you, no one can beat you in a challenge...." of any sort, at any level of perversely colorized attempts kid? Not my fault you just are who and what you are. Learn to live and grow.
 
Claxon said:
Yes.  Goodnight, nothing more to see around here folks, just move along, the lawyers will handle it from here. 
 
Pretty much....
 
Claxon said:
 
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion re: [16] MOTION for Temporary
 
Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction (with notice) : Motion
 
Hearing set for 6/30/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2-1, 401 W Trade St,
 
Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Robert J. Conrad Jr. This is
 
 
Have a nice day, tomorrow
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top