2015 Pilot Discussion.

[EastCheats]

Here's a fact for you, weasel. Don't do us any more 'favors"
 
Re: Cactus 18
 
You're a slick con artist.
 
Usapian to the core.

Bad parenting leads to bratty behavior 😉

 

[CactusPilot1]

Bad parenting leads to bratty behavior 😉

 
in this case, apparently so.
 

 

[EastCheats]

Thanks! If the en banc comes through Judge Tashima has pretty much done all the work.

Some estimated statistics regarding the Ninth Circuit from Judge Bea: Approximately 1000 Petitions for Rehearing En Banc are made each year. Of those 1000, approximately 40-50 receive an en banc call to vote on whether the case should be reheard en banc, and of those 40-50 only about 15-25 actually receive the simple majority vote of active judges needed to have the case reheard. Thats a .25% chance at best.

http://www.theninthcircuit.com/2010/05/22/the-ninth-circuits-active-en-banc-review-cases-slated-to-be-heard-en-banc-in-june/

 

[Metroyet]

There is no question Graber and Bybee were the majority in the ruling.
 
Who was the other guy?

The Senile one.

 

[CactusPilot1]

The Senile one.

 
He's the one on the left in the video of the hearing. The other two are taking notes, engaged and the one on the left is disengaged. Especially at 18 minutes with She-man ski's turn.


http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000007510
 
 
 
 
 

 

[EastCheats]

The Senile one.

 
No wonder Mr. Pie B can relate. Takes one to know one.
 

 

[CactusPilot1]

 
No wonder Mr. Pie B can relate. Takes one to know one.
 

 
Mr Brat is not as smart as he think he is, I like taking a needle and popping his over-inflated ego. He's a dork.
 

 

[snapthis]

He's the one on the left in the video of the hearing. The other two are taking notes, engaged and the one on the left is disengaged. Especially at 18 minutes with She-man ski's turn.http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000007510

By 19 minutes, he's checking out, fidgety, while Bybee and Graber taking notes, asking questions.

 

[luvthe9]

Boy, our little AFO group is quite chatty tonight.........remember there will be no NIC for you.



Enjoy PHX........big smiles all!

 

[EastCheats]

Boy, our little AFO group is quite chatty tonight.........remember there will be no NIC for you.



Enjoy PHX........big smiles all!

 
The Nic's for you..
 
Bigger smiles.
 

 

[luvthe9]

The Nic's for you..
 
Bigger smiles.

Only in your dreams son.

 

[EastCheats]

Only in your dreams son.

My dreams are your nightmare. 😉

"We thus remand this case with instructions to the district court to enter an order enjoining USAPA from participating in the McCaskill-Bond seniority integration proceedings, including any seniority-related discussions leading up to those proceedings, except to the extent that USAPA advocates the Nicolau Award."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This little problem you seem to miss.

Changing your name will not make a difference. 😉

 

[nic4us]

See, you're wrong again nicless.
 
Here's what the court wrote in the majority opinion:
 
"Thus, not only must the West Pilots advocate for the seniority interests of US Airways pilots generally in the SLI
proceedings, but they must also advocate the Nicolau Award vis-à-vis the date-of-hire seniority scheme that the East Pilots will present."
 
USAPA didn't present a DOH list Nicless. With just a little research or revision, the justices could have figured that out. USAPA presented a SLI based on a computer program of lifetime earnings. It put west guys and LAA guys hired after me ahead of me.
 
The USAPA merger committee no longer owed you anything and had no obligation to propose anything for you. You asked for and were granted your own committee to do that. Did the LAA committee propose the Nic? NO.
 
Face this-you guys did exactly what you have accused the east of doing for the last 8 years. Using an agreement(TA for us MOU for you) for a purpose other than it was intended. You knew what you were doing, and maybe it will work, but any moral high ground you claim is gone. You did not live up to what you agreed to.

 
Wrong again, the scab union OWES the West merger committee $1.4 million in monies they collected from the West specifically as a merger fund assessment.
 
and that is just the tiny tip of the iceberg.
 
Further, the computer program usapa used is flawed.  It uses incorrect income data and seniority assumptions to forecast the income.  Now, if you want to forecast true east earnings vs West or nAAtives for seniority purposes, be prepared to have a whole lot more hired after you piled on top.
 
Finally, the West did not use the MOU for something other than it was intended.  The MOU was intended to get everybody a raise in the interim to JCBA, while remaining seniority neutral. Unfortunately for usapa they could not remain seniority neutral AND avoid the DFR.  The neutrality was/is the DFR.  That is why the West voted overwhelmingly in favor. Of course being the clueless, greedy, low life, scum that usapa has proven to be, they thought they had finished off the Nic and could make some other proposal without ramification.  

 

[nic4us]

Thanks! If the en banc comes through Judge Tashima has pretty much done all the work.

 
You must realize that if the en banc comes through usapa is still out of the SLI ?   

 

[nevergiveup]

 
You must realize that if the en banc comes through usapa is still out of the SLI ?   

Who cares!