>Synopsis of the west MB SLI committee testimony thus far.<
Mr Freund, the west attorney, has not used the word “chutzpah” thus far in his most recent testimony.
The west insists on the Nicolau award, even after many court decisions do not find this a legal requirement, vs. the legacy American Pilots.
The west insists on the use of East routes, attrition and wide body aircraft, using the nic, vs. Legacy American Airlines.
West wants longevity used in the SLI list, after leap frogging the East pilots, vs. the Legacy American Pilots.
The west pilots insist that the company accepted the nic list, but feign memory loss about the JCBA requirement, vs. the Legacy American Pilots.
The west testifies about the 767 pay being in their favor on a SLI decision, but they fail to mentions they did not have 767’s. The west also fails to mention the 757, (hybrid of the 767 in their mind) pay was the same for, only the west pilots, as the small airbus pay on the 2013 snap shot date, vs. Legacy American pilots.
The west thinks that the MB SLI list decisions are ordered similar to a dinner MENU process;;;
Hypothetical, hypocritical Menu order from the west committee below;:;:
Lets see, we will take the nic without the JCBA requirement (IE: the nic sauce)
Then we would like to take the longevity with the nic sauce.
Oh yes, please add the nic frogged ( jump the East) legs.
For our west desert we want the east attrition, wide body aircraft and route structure strength cake, with the nic syrup and by the way, we want to eat it too.