electricjet98
Senior
The folowing is an excerpt from:
AI 07-95 - NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE REPORT
Doug Mowery, Chairman
September 10, 2007 – 3rd Q
Rice Committee and “equivalent, permanent, separate contractsâ€
We have had numerous meetings with the Rice Committee since the 17Jul07 joint MEC meeting called by Prater in Washington D.C. Until 14Aug these meetings involved only members of the Rice Committee and the East (Rice conducted separate meetings with the West).
Attending from the Rice Committee have been Paul Rice and Bruce York as the “constantsâ€. Auxiliary members include, Matt Marsh from Champion, Ray Miller from NorthWest, Dave Webb from FedEx and Larry Schulte (retired UAL and former ALPA Officer).
Attending from the East has been the entire NC (including Dean Colello), Jack Stephan, and one member from the merger committee (Kevin Barry). It was obvious at the early meetings that the Rice Committee had a desired preference for a single agreement due to its greater economic value. The MEC resolution for permanent separate contracts with equivalent economics (25Jul07) was panned by the committee and termed “dumb†by Bruce York at a 13Aug meeting.
On 14Aug the Rice committee brought the West and East side together for the first time, but that was to primarily explore a united response to a possible request for mediation the next day from management in JNC negotiations and to lay the groundwork for three days of “joint†meetings in PHX the following week. The request for mediation did not materialize the next day as many, including myself, expected.
The week of 20Aug the Rice Committee met for three full days in PHX. The West stated very clearly on day one that they were not interested in participating in this process if it did not lead to a single agreement with implementation of the Nicolau award. On Day two we met separately with the Rice Committee (RC) from the West and it became readily apparent that the RC also has the same goal---a single agreement with eventual implementation of the award. Paul Rice stated that we needed to work toward a “transition to the implementation†of the award. It appears also that their desire is to have this transition occur in a fairly short time frame (1-2 years. Although no specific time frame was mentioned directly by those schooled in carefully choosing their words, they repeatedly asked us questions of where would Dean Colello be in a couple years; where would Dan Scola be, etc. and did this begin to solve our issues?) We stayed on a very long time frame (forever, until the last protected pilot retires, etc.). Each time the discussion was artfully steered back to thinking of a much shorter duration.
Even more alarming was the impression that the RC did not back our fight for pay parity!
They continually discussed the large economics our pilots would receive and wouldn’t that sway them to vote in the affirmative. Mike Abram mentioned our Group 2 C/O getting raises from $125 to $165 in the single agreement. Notice he did not start from a pay parity rate of $141 to $165. Mike also mentioned getting back to JNC negotiations--- “you mean after we get pay parity, right?†I asked. Mike was silent.
I finally laid the question directly on the table and asked the RC if they backed our fight for pay parity. Paul Rice, First Vice President of ALPA, stated that pay parity was not at issue here and refused to answer the question. In short, it appears the RC agrees with the strategy of the West articulated in JMac’s Chair letter at the end of July to hold economic gains for our pilots hostage to an acquiescence on the Nicolau award. The greater those economic gains, the greater their chance of achieving their (West and RC) goals.
On the final day of discussions in PHX the RC presented us (just East in attendance) with a bullet point document that was introduced by Paul Rice as geared toward a “single†agreement with implementation of the Nicolau award after a defined period. Various protections were itemized in the document. The documents were numbered and had to be turned in at the end of the discussion. I have provided an Aspen update for Jack to forward privately and we will discuss this in much more detail at the 3Q meeting.
Doug Mowery
AAA Negotiating Chairman
Starting to panic USA320Pilot?

AI 07-95 - NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE REPORT
Doug Mowery, Chairman
September 10, 2007 – 3rd Q
Rice Committee and “equivalent, permanent, separate contractsâ€
We have had numerous meetings with the Rice Committee since the 17Jul07 joint MEC meeting called by Prater in Washington D.C. Until 14Aug these meetings involved only members of the Rice Committee and the East (Rice conducted separate meetings with the West).
Attending from the Rice Committee have been Paul Rice and Bruce York as the “constantsâ€. Auxiliary members include, Matt Marsh from Champion, Ray Miller from NorthWest, Dave Webb from FedEx and Larry Schulte (retired UAL and former ALPA Officer).
Attending from the East has been the entire NC (including Dean Colello), Jack Stephan, and one member from the merger committee (Kevin Barry). It was obvious at the early meetings that the Rice Committee had a desired preference for a single agreement due to its greater economic value. The MEC resolution for permanent separate contracts with equivalent economics (25Jul07) was panned by the committee and termed “dumb†by Bruce York at a 13Aug meeting.
On 14Aug the Rice committee brought the West and East side together for the first time, but that was to primarily explore a united response to a possible request for mediation the next day from management in JNC negotiations and to lay the groundwork for three days of “joint†meetings in PHX the following week. The request for mediation did not materialize the next day as many, including myself, expected.
The week of 20Aug the Rice Committee met for three full days in PHX. The West stated very clearly on day one that they were not interested in participating in this process if it did not lead to a single agreement with implementation of the Nicolau award. On Day two we met separately with the Rice Committee (RC) from the West and it became readily apparent that the RC also has the same goal---a single agreement with eventual implementation of the award. Paul Rice stated that we needed to work toward a “transition to the implementation†of the award. It appears also that their desire is to have this transition occur in a fairly short time frame (1-2 years. Although no specific time frame was mentioned directly by those schooled in carefully choosing their words, they repeatedly asked us questions of where would Dean Colello be in a couple years; where would Dan Scola be, etc. and did this begin to solve our issues?) We stayed on a very long time frame (forever, until the last protected pilot retires, etc.). Each time the discussion was artfully steered back to thinking of a much shorter duration.
Even more alarming was the impression that the RC did not back our fight for pay parity!
They continually discussed the large economics our pilots would receive and wouldn’t that sway them to vote in the affirmative. Mike Abram mentioned our Group 2 C/O getting raises from $125 to $165 in the single agreement. Notice he did not start from a pay parity rate of $141 to $165. Mike also mentioned getting back to JNC negotiations--- “you mean after we get pay parity, right?†I asked. Mike was silent.
I finally laid the question directly on the table and asked the RC if they backed our fight for pay parity. Paul Rice, First Vice President of ALPA, stated that pay parity was not at issue here and refused to answer the question. In short, it appears the RC agrees with the strategy of the West articulated in JMac’s Chair letter at the end of July to hold economic gains for our pilots hostage to an acquiescence on the Nicolau award. The greater those economic gains, the greater their chance of achieving their (West and RC) goals.
On the final day of discussions in PHX the RC presented us (just East in attendance) with a bullet point document that was introduced by Paul Rice as geared toward a “single†agreement with implementation of the Nicolau award after a defined period. Various protections were itemized in the document. The documents were numbered and had to be turned in at the end of the discussion. I have provided an Aspen update for Jack to forward privately and we will discuss this in much more detail at the 3Q meeting.
Doug Mowery
AAA Negotiating Chairman
Junebug,
People have been telling you and the AWA MEC over-and-over that there needs to be a compromise to the Nicolau Award and the AWA MEC has not changed their postion. In my opinion, the AWA MEC has under estimated the resolve of the East pilots to never let the Nicolau Award proceed.
Dependent on the result of tomorrow's meeting, the strategic decisions made, and the advice of Lee Seham there could be a NMB Form 1 filing as soon as this week. If that happens the EC, US Airways MEC, and AWA MEC will lose control of the process and union "imposition" could occur.
There is still time to reach a "realistic solution" to the Nicolau Award problem, but unless the AWA MEC is willing to negotiate a compromise then I believe USAPA will start the formal process to kick ALPA off of both the East and West property very soon. If USAPA is successful in thier effort to replace ALPA nobody truly knows how the courts will rule on the Nicolau Award because it is a private contract versus a corporate contract. Therefore, is Lee Seham's or Pete Janhunen's opinion accurate and which one will be viewed as accurate by the Court's?
Regards,
USA320Pilot
Starting to panic USA320Pilot?


