Fleet Service apathy

[Harry Callahan]

And what about the ones on Facebook who do not want union issues on there?

 

[pjirish317]

And what about the ones on Facebook who do not want union issues on there?

Exactly!!!!!!!!!!

 

[cltrat]

I was thinking the same thing.

I was wondering if he's trying to be funny or he's just illiterate ? either way he's quite the endorsement

 

[saywhat]

Joe. May I call you Joe? I answered you the first two times the same as now. They all have experience. As to what you want to know you would have to ask them. They are on FACEBOOK. They've posted their BIO'S. You are free to go and look. I said Iknow and have known all but one for 20 plus years. You can go to occupyiam141.com also. I think you are trying to be specific so why dont you just say it. Which candidate are you wanting specific info on?

The answer is BK none, GG none, GA none and GA GC PHL. I haven't been on facebook to see what any of them say but this is what I have heard. Get real.

 

[niblet]

What about those of us that are not on facebook and have no desire to be? What about BK from CLT. Does he have any Step 3 experience?

I will relay you concerns.

 

[pjirish317]

I will relay you concerns.

That was question #1. What about question #2?

 

[pjirish317]

niblet,

Nevermind. I forgot that the "in-house" attorney was going to handle ALL step 3 hearings, (per Tim Nelson himself), so that would make the AGC's good errand boys for the attorney. So really no experience needed when voting the occupy ticket, the attorney will handle everything. Right? 😛h34r: 😉 😛h34r:

 

[wings396]

wings,

That was canoli that was there for the inception af the current attendance policy we now use, not Delany. And were you there in the room for this so called "back-door" deal. Do you have first hand knowledge that, that is in fact what happened. Otherwise it is just speculation on your part isn't it? Or maybe politically motivated perhaps?

Are you nelson's campaign manager?

No Mr Smiley Face, I'm not anyone's campaign manager. Nobody was in the room for the BUF deal, but can you deny that it went down?

 

[pjirish317]

No Mr Smiley Face, I'm not anyone's campaign manager. Nobody was in the room for the BUF deal, but can you deny that it went down?

Can you confirm that it was canoli that accepted the current attendance policy and not Delany? I was not in the room either, so what went down was that the BUF employees were furloughed. Unless you are Delany, the IAM attorneys, the company's attorneys, or anybody else that was privy to that situation, all you are doing is speculating now aren't you?

 

[wings396]

They were locked out prior to their scheduled date, thus the letter agreeing to the pension....

 

[700UW]

You know you all can be upset with Canale, but to call him an Italian pasty name as an insult is just wrong and shows your lack of maturity.

If there isnt an attendance policy in the contract, then the company is free to impose one as long as it doesnt interfere with the CBA, it's called Management Rights.

 

[pjirish317]

You know you all can be upset with Canale, but to call him an Italian pasty name as an insult is just wrong and shows your lack of maturity.

I know it is an insult that Itialian pastries have to be associated with canoli!!!!!!!!!!!!!er I mean canale. 😛

 

[pjirish317]

They were locked out prior to their scheduled date, thus the letter agreeing to the pension....

So they were going to be furloughed anyway? Is that what you are saying? And the IAM got them some extra moving money and pension credit?

 

[niblet]

So they were going to be furloughed anyway? Is that what you are saying? And the IAM got them some extra moving money and pension credit?

They didnt get any extra. They were intitled it anyway. Furlogh benefits. They were locked out. period. Fact. I think what bothers people is that WE the IAM, the district let it happen. Feel some empathy for your union brothers. This could easily happen to you RDU or me FLL. I want to know the District IS going to do something about it.

 

[700UW]

Do you not understand the IAM couldnt stop that?

All they could do was file a grievance, it would take two years or so to be resolved and the employees wouldnt still be working in BUF, they would have been eliminated and given their options.

So please tell the board how the IAM could have stopped the company from doing what they did?

It's not a major dispute under the RLA, it would be a minor one.