WorldTraveler said:
first of all, UA has NOT been posting financial results anywhere close to what DL has been posting.
Who said otherwise?
WorldTraveler said:
second, for someone who supposedly studied business at UGa, dawg seems clueless to the financial reality that governs companies.
for someone who worked at a major in management your read/comprehension skills (or lack off) are terrible.
Wait.....you are a tech grad aren't you? That would explain a lot.
WorldTraveler said:
It doesn't make ANY sense to continue to employ a workgroup at MEM that doesn't produce the revenues necessary to justify itself. MEM hasn't had a widebody or int'l flight for years which means most of the cargo is either Dash (which I believe can also be sold at the ticket counter) or HRs (remains not resources).
I'm not *as* upset about MEM. That comes with the closing of the hub.
However, cutting jobs when the company is rolling in money is a joke. These jobs have very very very very little to do with Delta's overall cost base. This is cutting to cut.
WorldTraveler said:
As I said, I'm a little more surprised at SLC but Kev says there is a history there which we clearly don't know.
okay Delta has a history of trying to cut every single station they have and give it to DGS. That doesn't make anything right.
WorldTraveler said:
And as Kev also notes and I fully expect, the SLC employees can be protected in other depts. likely with little to no movement in pay.
They will get a job, now they might get to move to LGA......sounds awesome.
WorldTraveler said:
What I find absolutely fascinating, dawg, is that you feel it is your responsibility to harp on union issues involving other employee groups since union efforts in Tech Ops have NEVER amounted to enough to move the needle despite the fact that mechanics at most airlines are one of the easiest workgroups to unionize.
why is it that you have to throw out non-truths for the pilots and rampers esp since the pilots have a union which is what you think the rest of DL employees have and yet you don't think they are capable of standing up for themselves?
What non-truths have I thrown out? Please show me.
And again, quit telling people what they can/can't post on. If we are going that route then you need to leave......you have nothing to do with Delta Air Lines and shouldn't be posting on such. (see I can play stupid games too)
WorldTraveler said:
DL does not as a policy reduce pay if an employee is involuntarily moved from one dept. to another.
unless they feel like they wanna reduce their pay.
WorldTraveler said:
and as for part 2, DL's motivation with putting employees in the dept. where resources are needed is no different than when DL made the decision to quit flying widebody aircraft to Florida and instead redeploy them on int'l routes. DL moved 777s to DTW for Asian flying because there was a greater potential to use those aircraft more efficiently and for greater potential for financial gain. Given that DL's int'l operation from DTW is larger than it was with NW, it is hard to argue that DL wasn't interested in using its resources in the best profit-motivated manner.
oh good lord. What a stretch........
WorldTraveler said:
And SLC mainline IS growing because of DL's focus on the west and as part of DL's overall shift in flying from regional carriers to mainline.
Not really true. System wide mainline growth doesn't mean SLC mainline growth. For the most part SLC is flat. SLC will get its growth from the large RJ, not much mainline.
WorldTraveler said:
if flight activity is increasing - which I just cited - then costs for servicing mainline flights will have to increase. Note that DL is increasing the percentage of DL operated, DL employee worked flights but decreasing the number of RJ operated and staffed flights.
but you haven't cited anything. Again system mainline growth doesn't equal mainline growth at SLC. Mainline is growing (mostly) in the east. DCI is growing in the west.
For SLC they are pretty much flat......