IAM Nominations and Results

[rat tales]

Hey dude how could Pam King be with the Asucion in SLC if she was with Delaney in ATL get your facts straight.

From what I hear there are around 7 AGC's assigned to ATL. Some are given time off, some are enslaved. Al Faung for instance. He was let out until he lost important stations. She most likely was on work release.

 

[Liberace]

From what I hear there are around 7 AGC's assigned to ATL. Some are given time off, some are enslaved. Al Faung for instance. He was let out until he lost important stations. She most likely was on work release.

King was in Atlanta with your Leader Delaney tring to organize Delta. Stop spinning the facts.

 

[rat tales]

King was in Atlanta with your Leader Delaney tring to organize Delta. Stop spinning the facts.

Don't be silly. She has been organizing Delta for the past 8 years. She can board a plane whenever Canale barks.

 

[Liberace]

Don't be silly. She has been organizing Delta for the past 8 years. She can board a plane whenever Canale barks.

Now Rat tales according to Delaney your guru who you will following blindly he said he was with King at the airport all week, he departed on Friday. So who is lying you or Delaney. Was she signed in on the SLC Local Lodge book? And who cares if they were there or not this strikes at the heart of your integriety, and how low you are capable of stooping. Is it because King is a woman?

 

[perserverance]

Thank you for your response. This is what bothers me. Just one more question. How can we have a vote for committee people only to have GS empower himself to just choose who he wants. Are these positions in addition to the ones that were elected or are they replacing the ones elected. Either way how can he appoint them. Doesn't it have to go back to a vote by the membership. Shouldn't the membership decide or is it the GS show. Why does each person who assumes that role think that they can do whatever they want. Why doesn't anyone think that membership deserves the right to choose. How is this process "okay". If there are indeed additional positions opened in the "committee" why doesn't that go back to the membership so that they can vote on who else they want in those positions. We have already seen that GS keeps close to him the previous players. I think it seems so shady. Did we really have an election? Can we re-elect? Can we demand election for the additional committee people if indeed there are going to be more than what was previously intended?

This isn't what bothres you, it bothers most people. I totally agree that anyone that G.S. would
like to be pulled up to the status of ''committee'' should be nominated and voted upon. The current
''committee'' is , by initials, J.L., G.S., F.C. with no election. The three were nominated for three
open positions and ran unopposed. I'm glad you see this and you have every right to question it.
Call the local and ask your questions and ask for someone to get back to you. That is what I have
done and continue to do so even now. This union is big on appointments and not allowing the group
to decide thier represenitives. We will have this option in June to displace Canale. Lets' see if he does
indeed lose will he remain a active member in this union. In Phl when J.H. lost his appointed title, he
hasn't attended one meeting or shown any support to the previous beloved IAM.

Thanks

 

[New Direction Spokesman]

US here is the classic trap that Liberace, District Farce, 141, etc are trying to lead everyone into. They have experienced such trama last week in nominations that they are grasping at straws and coming up with ways to derail the New Direction Team. Their latest is that all New Direction & Delaney in particular hate women. It is so pathetic but so typical of KA, RE, and RC to stoop this low. Don't fall into their trap, let them look for something esle to rile the members up. Stick to the facts. RC's record speaks for itself. It's barely a whisper but it speaks!!!

 

[john john]

Their latest is that all New Direction & Delaney in particular hate women.

Are they Gay

 

[Liberace]

US here is the classic trap that Liberace, District Farce, 141, etc are trying to lead everyone into. They have experienced such trama last week in nominations that they are grasping at straws and coming up with ways to derail the New Direction Team. Their latest is that all New Direction & Delaney in particular hate women. It is so pathetic but so typical of KA, RE, and RC to stoop this low. Don't fall into their trap, let them look for something esle to rile the members up. Stick to the facts. RC's record speaks for itself. It's barely a whisper but it speaks!!!

The facts are rat tails lied Pam was with Delaney, and you are right about the trama the trama of thinking as Delaney as our President, as far as women go their slate speaks for itself no women no minorities no Public Contact employees the largest group left out in the cold, that is what is pathetic.

 

[rat tales]

Are they Gay

Profile says female and says she has a wife. One can only assume!
How did Seinfeld say..."not that there is any thing wrong with that"

 

[Liberace]

Profile says female and says she has a wife. One can only assume!
How did Seinfeld say..."not that there is any thing wrong with that"

So you make fun of the flag, disparage women, and anti gay....Wow

 

[imbaaack]

This isn't what bothres you, it bothers most people. I totally agree that anyone that G.S. would
like to be pulled up to the status of ''committee'' should be nominated and voted upon. The current
''committee'' is , by initials, J.L., G.S., F.C. with no election. The three were nominated for three
open positions and ran unopposed. I'm glad you see this and you have every right to question it.
Call the local and ask your questions and ask for someone to get back to you. That is what I have
done and continue to do so even now. This union is big on appointments and not allowing the group
to decide thier represenitives. We will have this option in June to displace Canale. Lets' see if he does
indeed lose will he remain a active member in this union. In Phl when J.H. lost his appointed title, he
hasn't attended one meeting or shown any support to the previous beloved IAM.

Thanks

That's what makes it all suspicious when you look at who GS is surrounding himself with by appointees. How do we know that J.H. is really still not involved. He could be just laying low and letting his fellow buds do his work. To me that is a loop hole. It was like they knew that those three would run unopposed and then knew that G.S. would or could start appointing committee people. How many committee people are there now? and should it only be the elected three? Why isn't GS accountable for these actions. Why can he just make up who and how many people he has in his committee? Why are these things so secretive. If there are additional committe positions then let us know so we can put in there who we (the membership) want. Why should we allow GS to appoint his own committee. That reaks of some sneaky S*&T!

 

[imbaaack]

That's what makes it all suspicious when you look at who GS is surrounding himself with by appointees. How do we know that J.H. is really still not involved. He could be just laying low and letting his fellow buds do his work. To me that is a loop hole. It was like they knew that those three would run unopposed and then knew that G.S. would or could start appointing committee people. How many committee people are there now? and should it only be the elected three? Why isn't GS accountable for these actions. Why can he just make up who and how many people he has in his committee? Why are these things so secretive. I did hear that GS has selected additional people to serve on the committee and one of those individuals was J.H. right hand man and friend. C'mon you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out what is going on. If there are additional committe positions then let us know so we can put in there who we (the membership) want. Why should we allow GS to appoint his own committee. That reaks of some sneaky S*&T! I

 

[rat tales]

So you make fun of the flag, disparage women, and anti gay....Wow

Madam,
This strikes at the heart of your integriety. There are three people of whom you speak on the "New Direction Team"
Woman hater I am not.

 

[Liberace]

Madam,
This strikes at the heart of your integriety. There are three people of whom you speak on the "New Direction Team"
Woman hater I am not.

Tell me then what proposed AGC's on the new direction slate from the customers service classification Customer Service are women, or black?

 

[redeye]

Tell me then what proposed AGC's on the new direction slate from the customers service classification Customer Service are women, or black?

Liberace,

On this very thread are posts that include
resources for the information you need.
To ask posters to obtain information already
provided is not fair. Please do your legwork.
Please do not highjack a thread for personal
agendas.

thanks,