Here's a quarter! Call someone who cares!
Hey Piney , i remember a country song that went like that

Here's a quarter! Call someone who cares!

In the last few months, the loads up front have plummeted. I've had an empty seat next to me more often than not. Last week, I flew a PIT-PHL, between two focus cities with tons of elites, a route that used to be a crapshoot for me to upgrade on back when I was a Gold. I was the ONLY PERSON up front.

By contrast, there were only three F seats open on the CLT-SFO A321.
Exactly........any why would the passengers even care what an airline employee contract is all about?? All the passenger wants is to get where he's going, safely, on time and whatever it is that his ticket entitles him to.Correction: Passengers do not KNOW what is going on with the EMB FA's (hence no posts). They do know about the service or lack there of. Think before you spew please. Don't blame the passenger for not knowing your contracts. <_<
In my new, post-airline life, I will soon be in a position to do a lot of business travel (snip)
The snack basket got 8 pages but my post about the poor EMB FAs gets no response?
Because passengers don't care about the employees and their misfortunes.
in addition to being inherently sexist, your remarks echoe, almost verbatim, dp's position on the wants and needs of airline customers. (that kool-aid must be real tasty!) nevertheless, both dp and his devoted disciples, (i.e., those who blindly accept and memorize whatever comes out of his mouth and repeat it frequently) by homogenizing the customer base into one entity with three specific needs: (on-time, safe, and friendly service) he is essentially devaluing everything u East is built upon. sure, this type of thinking mitigates complexity and diversity and fits well on powerpoint presentations and graphs, however, it is not reality! u needs to differentiate the product(s) and our customers, not devalue it.All the passenger wants is to get where he's going, safely, on time and whatever it is that his ticket entitles him to.
Sexist? What's sexist about my comment? DP's position has been pretty much the same since he took the helm from Bill Franke........AWA was a low cost carrier and his intention is for it to remain a low cost carrier. He's never said otherwise and the investors must think that his business plan is worth it. Otherwise, they wouldn't have forked over that much money. And he's also stated that he wants a full service low cost carrier. So as my previous post stated......if the passenger has issues, make those issues known to corporate. This is a new airline........no mention of US Airways east or west.....just US Airways.......a whole new ideal is being put forth for the new airline and neither I, nor you, have any say in how DP will run this airline. It's the new reality and there will be a difference in this new product we are selling...........but it's going to take time and feedback from passengers and employees.in addition to being inherently sexist, your remarks echoe, almost verbatim, dp's position on the wants and needs of airline customers. (that kool-aid must be real tasty!) nevertheless, both dp and his devoted disciples, (i.e., those who blindly accept and memorize whatever comes out of his mouth and repeat it frequently) by homogenizing the customer base into one entity with three specific needs: (on-time, safe, and friendly service) he is essentially devaluing everything u East is built upon. sure, this type of thinking mitigates complexity and diversity and fits well on powerpoint presentations and graphs, however, it is not reality! u needs to differentiate the product(s) and our customers, not devalue it.
first, i appreciate your optimism...and i try to share it. second, you categorized the entire customer population as "he" in your initial post: that is indeed sexist! third, i know you believe what you are telling yourself is true regarding "one airline", but, you are wrong. i assure you, fragmentation identity still exists at u. east, particularly among my psa and piedmont colleagues. and i think that is great!!! it reflects pride! it's simply not that easy to say "on january 4th we are all one airline". finally, investor confidence and capital investment in the new u clearly considered the financial power of u. east's solid fflyer base. so, i don't think it is entirely accurate to believe these investors were supporting a wn mentality and service levels. much like the new u, there are, and always will be, different cultures with different understandings of quality. what an innovative management team would do is recognize and respond to this fragmented reality. i submit that dp is not doing that.Sexist? What's sexist about my comment? DP's position has been pretty much the same since he took the helm from Bill Franke........AWA was a low cost carrier and his intention is for it to remain a low cost carrier. He's never said otherwise and the investors must think that his business plan is worth it. Otherwise, they wouldn't have forked over that much money. And he's also stated that he wants a full service low cost carrier. So as my previous post stated......if the passenger has issues, make those issues known to corporate. This is a new airline........no mention of US Airways east or west.....just US Airways.......a whole new ideal is being put forth for the new airline and neither I, nor you, have any say in how DP will run this airline. It's the new reality and there will be a difference in this new product we are selling...........but it's going to take time and feedback from passengers and employees.
That's great......hopefully the optimism will be contagious. And as far as my reference to "he"....that is just a generic reference and NOTHING else.first, i appreciate your optimism...and i try to share it. second, you categorized the entire customer population as "he" in your initial post: that is indeed sexist! third, i know you believe what you are telling yourself is true regarding "one airline", but, you are wrong. i assure you, fragmentation identity still exists at u. east, particularly among my psa and piedmont colleagues. and i think that is great!!! it reflects pride! it's simply not that easy to say "on january 4th we are all one airline". finally, investor confidence and capital investment in the new u clearly considered the financial power of u. east's solid fflyer base. so, i don't think it is entirely accurate to believe these investors were supporting a wn mentality and service levels. much like the new u, there are, and always will be, different cultures with different understandings of quality. what an innovative management team would do is recognize and respond to this fragmented reality. i submit that dp is not doing that.