Although my memory is not what it used to be, maybe I simply overlooked a post along the way.
I still say that any man that has a serious issue with AMFA that we should be alerted about should be man enough to stand by it with his name so we can verify the "other side of the story". All we have here is alias users claiming they are this or that and bashing. And this goes for both or in this case, all three sides.
Anyone who wants to be taken serious would me man enough to allow the two sides to be observed before anyone has to believe or make a conclusion as to the accuracy of the "tale".