fifidriver
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2011
- Messages
- 339
- Reaction score
- 455
How could the west stop "pursuing the Nic"? Who represents the west and who could initiate, negotiate, or settle upon a different path that would ensure that USAPA and the Company would be free from any legal action from not retaining the NIC for any JCBA contract talks? If 1 or 1,000 west pilots "agreed" in whatever form you or USAPA might like to abandon the NIC, there would be no change in legal liability for USAPA or Management. Thus the Company has two choices, appealing to the 9th notwithstanding: 1) negotiate with USAPA and risk a substantial collusion liability from one or more west pilots (or east for that matter) in a future lawsuit or 2) refuse USAPA's request to insert a Non-NIC list because they consider the legal risk of doing so to be too great. The west pilots, in whole or in part, cannot take a single action to change these two choices USAPA has forced Management to make.
"Read 'em and weep"... I believe that this is about as accurate an assessment of our current situation as you will find. All bloviation and vitriol aside, how would you advise the West to proceed to "move" off the Nic, assuming they were willing?
Regardless of the result of the merger attempt, I believe that the company will absolutely appeal the DJ, and at the last possible date, in order to prolong their unbelievable labor cost advantage as long as they possibly can. They will ride this broken down thing just as far as it will go. Parker must literally come into the office every day and ask Kirby to pinch him, just to make sure he is not dreaming. He doesn't have to do a thing as far as running an airline, except to watch the money roll in, (our money), and find new ways to keep the status quo.