cleardirect
Veteran
- Joined
- May 24, 2008
- Messages
- 6,234
- Reaction score
- 9,749
Not really. I just want some semblance of sanity and fairness in what we have. I have seen juries do many things. A few years ago, one in New York awarded a woman $1 million bucks for the loss of psychic powers after a CT Scan, so don't put all your eggs in that basket. I'm sure another kangaroo court like the one Judge Wake presided over will have the same result...overturned on appeal.
Let's have a trial where the NIC has to undergo the smell check, not barred from testimony. Then we will see what is what.
Driver...
You can wish for that all day long. Ask Santa to bring you ANOTHER trial to check the fairness of the Nicolau.
Nicolau created the list. The executive counsel looked at the list and said it was fine. The jury saw usapa's arguments and disregarded them. The ninth did not look at the merits. Judge Silver said that an arbitration is a demonstration of a fair result.
So you are not going to get anyone else to "check for a smell test" it passed that test many times. Just not in your opinion.
Now what if. What if we did have a trial and the jury said that the list was fair. What then? Another trial? More accusation of biased judges?