bagchucker
Senior
:huh: what is top out rate of pay with this tentative contract???? It isn't defined.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a summary comming out this comming Tuesday.
Once again there is no issue on seniorty. Its DOH
Doesn't matter what you vote the IAM representing the NWA scabs will have you vote again.......I would vote NO!
Amen to your post!!! I couldn't have said it better myself...Thanks...i'm going to take this moment to point out something , you still have a job .. did you forget about our brothers and sisters on Furlough ... Remember them ? If i'm correct didn't the east vote to give them the boot , and then to add insult to injury stick that 60 day clause in the contract ? remember that ??
This proposal while not the greatest for the east memebers is still not THAT bad , why ? because it protects JOBS ... i've said it before , you can go back and read my old posts , i've always said it , i CARE about our filed stations EAST and WEST , and under this they will be protected along with our cargo operations ... That's not a small thing, so don't be so dissmisve of it ..
i'm going to take this moment to point out something , you still have a job .. did you forget about our brothers and sisters on Furlough ... Remember them ? If i'm correct didn't the east vote to give them the boot , and then to add insult to injury stick that 60 day clause in the contract ? remember that ??
This proposal while not the greatest for the east memebers is still not THAT bad , why ? because it protects JOBS ... i've said it before , you can go back and read my old posts , i've always said it , i CARE about our filed stations EAST and WEST , and under this they will be protected along with our cargo operations ... That's not a small thing, so don't be so dissmisve of it ..
With all the banter of how the IAM is in bed with the company, and I don't doubt that they are, why did US Airways employees allow them to stay on the property? Was it a matter of being familiar with the devil you've dealt with for so many years? Was it fear that it could be worse?
Sounds like a hostage situation of sorts. Sad. Why did the TWU back out? What about the mechanics and related? They tried to get cards for an election but the majority still wanted the IAM. Hard to comprehend.By the majority it was the fear that it could be worse. In the last merger Piedmont ramp was nonunion and the company not the union requested a representation election on the grounds that the Piedmont employees should have a choice. The request was granted (never been done in the history of the NMB) and the union was decertified by a slim margin. The next day the company impossed pay cuts and benefit cuts that were overwhelming. We had to wait a year after decertification to get a union back. The IAM were good at feeding lies and the gulible employees stupidly voted them in. The union was good at feeding misleading info or just plain lying outright and the membership became weaker so they still exist on the property. Our only chance at getting rid of them was blown by the TWU backing out!
This issue has been resolved already. DOE. Is what is being used