Travelpro72
Veteran
- Jan 30, 2005
- 4,964
- 455
That was insane back in the day. Just imagine what you might find if you dig deep enough in the seat pockets. Ya might find more than you hoped for. LOL YUCK !
Thanks for the vote of confidence - after 21 years I do like my job and I do make the announcements ~ I hope clearly and I was simply pointing out that I think we make too much of them and everyone tunes out. And sick call? What does that have to do with announcements? Bad day there???
Because you're probably one of the muddlemouths who HATES her job so much she can't make a clear announcement. That must be why we have double-digit increases in SkyMall sales that make the company money in true commission. Don't you have a sick call to make? :down:
Not anymore than what you do in the jumpseat while reading US weekly. Go make your sick call now...
You just keep digging yourself deeper, I hope someone in Tempe is looking at this!You're right: I'm sorry. I did wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning and I just went to town. Didn't mean to take out my annoyance at the sick out on you.
So back to topic for me: regardless of whether or not the announcements are spoken or on video, the vast majority of pax zone out because they're either too important to listen, or too stupid. And this is not aimed at all of you loyal FFOCUS fans who know it inside and out. I mean seriously, how many times does someone think they can talk on their phone during takeoff until it just dies out?
I sure hope the passengers aren't talking on their phones during takeoff.......they are supposed to be turned off prior to.........just like the announcements say.I mean seriously, how many times does someone think they can talk on their phone during takeoff until it just dies out?
You can make fun of yourself, you can criticize the company, you can annoy your coworkers....but you never..never...ever...insult the customer! Obviously you are new around here!You just keep digging yourself deeper, I hope someone in Tempe is looking at this!
Bob,Right here is a living breathing example of the difference between CCY & the Sandcastle. Granted a small diference but a critical difference.
When was the last time anyone at the old US said "Sorry I was wrong"
I sure hope the passengers aren't talking on their phones during takeoff.......they are supposed to be turned off prior to.........just like the announcements say.
Thank God cell phones do work in the air, otherwise UA flt 93 might have actually landed IN the White House, no?
Do you really think an "original" name for the magazine would do anyting to increase revenue? Putting the USAirways name out there creates brand recognition. Using "Attache" does nothing of the sort.Now that is ORIGINAL!! LMAO , these people need to get a grip - nobody wants to see USAIRWAYS plastered all over everything come on now - GAG (get a grip) I hope to god they don't go with the tacky video that AWA has either I think the East video is nice but could use some updating- What will they come up with next - maybe they will change dividend miles to USAIRWAYS miles - how original!!! makes you wonder if the advertising execs got their degree from trailer park U!!
A great publication and the US Airways name should have an impact......not that alone will get passengers but it sure can't hurt. I am looking forward to seeing the first issue.Do you really think an "original" name for the magazine would do anyting to increase revenue? Putting the USAirways name out there creates brand recognition. Using "Attache" does nothing of the sort.
I agree .that's why I think keeping it generic (some woudl say un-original) is better than having some fancy name like "Attache". The more places the company name is ..the better.A great publication and the US Airways name should have an impact......not that alone will get passengers but it sure can't hurt. I am looking forward to seeing the first issue.
And the low cost carrier label is always being used. "Attache'" is so not low cost carrier, IMO. Like putting a Rolls Royce hood ornament on an old VW Bug.I agree .that's why I think keeping it generic (some woudl say un-original) is better than having some fancy name like "Attache"
AGreed ..I think it sounds kind of pretentious. I also remember people complaining that "envoy class" would be changed simply to "business class". Sounds like a good idea to me.And the low cost carrier label is always being used. "Attache'" is so not low cost carrier, IMO. Like putting a Rolls Royce hood ornament on an old VW Bug.
You are so absolutely right! If you have a company, every product you carry should carry the same name. That has been the whole demise of the airline industry, they cannot hold onto an identifiable product...for example: "USAirways flight 123 operated by United Express flight 234 operated by Sky West flight 345, as America West flight 456 leaves Phoenix at 1pm and arrives in Orlando at 12pm the next day, will you need a rental car with that or can I connect you to Hotels.com?". Try explaining that one to your customer.Do you really think an "original" name for the magazine would do anyting to increase revenue? Putting the USAirways name out there creates brand recognition. Using "Attache" does nothing of the sort.