OH, BTW.....if we had signed a contract with what the company testified in federal court would be expected (Kirby + an additional 7-8% for a total of 10-11% on top of AWA wages), YES we ALL have lost MILLIONS of dollars collectively. Further every one of you would have gained one week paid vacation, 100% DH, 100% MECH, 100% cancellation, etc.
The point that I am trying to make (especially for lurkers) is that unless you change USAPA's constitution.....YOU WILL NEVER GAIN ANYTHING (other than the left seat....eventually at the nations crappiest airline contract). If you are already a captain, you have lost big time.
You know how I hate to rain on your parade, but I'm going to give you a little shower.
The 100% DH is not that big of a deal, and for reserves it's actually a good deal. You see, we do only get 1/2 the DH as pay-no-credit, but the trip rig is "back filled" and it is also pnc. When we first signed on to the idea, this wonderful company decided that half pay for DH meant no rigs for the trip! We won a grievance on that, so the rigs are there and trip rig is paid as pay-no-credit. So for most of the trips as a block holder it doesn't make any difference except that PNC can let you get paid above the pay cap. For a reserve, all PNC goes above your guarantee. For the last two months that has been around 12 hrs extra for me. Every once in a while you will get burned when their is no back fill, but it comes out way ahead for reserves.
The 100% mech. cancellation would be nice, but again it doesn't come into play as much as you would think. Most of our trips are multi-day parings and if a leg cancels you are rescheduled and the trip WILL pay it's published value. If a flight goes down for MX and it is flown by another equipment type, you get paid. So, in the vast majority of cases, you get paid, with the 1 day island guys, all niters, and trans-atlantic occasionally getting burned. It would be nice, but it would be a matter of what we would have to give up for it.
Besides pay, vacation was the biggest hit for me in LOA 93.
I think it was you that compared us to Eagle. I'm sure there are some MDA guys on here that could speak to it, but I'm pretty sure they went under the Eagle contract and were none too pleased with it, so I'm guessing the whole package was not that good.
Are you sure that a company official testified that more than Kirby was on the table? The reason I ask is that Kirby was in a crew news session and seemed to deny that. I know Jack Stephan did, but you guys don't put any stock in him, right?
If you are getting all your numbers from KH, you need to back them up. He has tunnel vision and has been flat out wrong on a lot. The LOA 93 decision should be out soon and then you should be able to tell if you guys can get the few hundred more you need.
BTW, does anyone know if this is correct for DL? It doesn't look that good, if were to include the Nic and a return to the right seat, and Parker say we can't have that much! (of course I'd like to have the rates, but I thought they were higher and the per diem and retirement aren't much, and a 70 reserve guarantee)
http://www.willflyforfood.com/airline-pilot-salary/127/Delta-Air-Lines.html