Iclubbabyseals
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2011
- Messages
- 793
- Reaction score
- 350
Not a teabagger, but not a big fan of unions that have to intimidate their members.
So, "teabaggers" intimidate their members? That might certainly qualify as another way to define as a verb, "teabaggers", those who "stimulate" a male's, um, rocks?
So, you think (and that might be an unwarranted assumption) that teabaggers do not intimidate their members?
I agree with you, unions should never "intimidate" their members. They should educate their members so they will make educated decisions, unlike teabaggers or those who depend on Faux news.
Do you have evidence of unions "intimidating" their members? Try to be specific. Starting with USAPA. I don't think you can do it.