What's new

US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
My point was that it doesn't have to be and the captain has the government and company authority to stop it. If any captain is sure of his chosen path in one of these circumstances, no one can force him/her to do anything. Could there be repercussions later? Certainly if the captain overlooked something or whatever. But that is the price for wearing those 4 stripes. When you take the job it should be with the knowledge that your decisions will be second guessed/questioned at times. If anyone can't withstand the scrutiny that goes with the job maybe they shouldn't take the job. Basically all I see are claims, quite possibly accurate, that the second guessing/questioning is becoming more prevalent. But using that as an excuse to blame others for "taking away" captain's authority is a lame excuse. Agents, mechanics, CP's and even the company didn't lend that authority to captains to use as long as they played nice - it was bestowed by much higher authorities than that.

Jim

This Captain I know had a problem with an airplane. She was uncomfortable with the explaination given regarding the problem. Her flight plan was in question. The company lined up against her. All of the West pilots that post here lined up against her. The company hacks on the East side lined up against her. The CP lined up against her. She was escorted out of the terminal by security.

What did her 4 stripes buy her? Where are those "higher authorities" now? What do you do when a corporation goes into full damage control mode and smears your reputation and humiliates you?

Yes SIR, it's a whole new day.

Driver <_<
 
luvn737s, on 22 August 2011 - 07:13 PM, said:


It looks to me like the APU starter could be fed from AC Bus 2 through the APU TR.



yet another amateur wannabe engineer that has no offing clue.

Missing one ingredient in all of that, wasn't he. AC power... LOL!!!!!
 
Looking at the schematic, it appears that if the plane is powered APU start is powered from AC #2 through a dedicated T/R. That may be wrong, but I'll tell ya that those 330 schematics aren't nearly as good as the old 727 ones. Of course, given the wisdom of the FAA and US (plus who knows which other carriers) all the system info is back home in the training manual when you need it.

Jim

Yes, Jim. Let's just sit around and wax nostalgic about the good ol' days of the 727.

Just as obsolete as you are. A workhorse well past it's prime and ready for the boneyard.
 
They ask the Flight Attendants if they are ready to board, but they don't ask me squat except if it's OK to close the doors (Fuel Slip onboard).
May I respectfully suggest that you may have a problem communicating with your crew? Perhaps you could do something different to include them, help them feel that they are a part of the decision-making process.
 
So there's conflicting info in a Training Manual between APU section and The Electrical Power section. Maybe Little Miss Can't Be Wrong can use that as defense of her ignorance. "It's not my fault!!!"

You really are an effing rookie. You're like the Cessna 150 pilot at the grass strip inveighing to the gas boy about how the Lear Jet goes 900 miles per hour.
 
Did you ever think that block+16 was going to hit you in the conscience and possibly get some of your captain's authority taken away? Shoulda.
As was very well stated, captains authority can only be given away, not taken. Please try to keep up.
 
Yes, Jim. Let's just sit around and wax nostalgic about the good ol' days of the 727.

Just as obsolete as you are. A workhorse well art it's prime and ready for the boneyard.
YOU gotta luv it our boy JIM!, IS it a 9 light trip, or a triple flame out, why can't I use the APU? JIM the son of CAPT KAVAR!
 
As I said above, nothing new. I had an agent board an aircraft in my absence back in the 90's after telling them not to and why (IAM in negotiations and daily check was going to take a lot longer than normal - the only indication of mechanic action when I told the agent was a toolbox sitting under the plane). I came back, found the passengers boarding, and asked the agent why only to learn that the ramp tower guy "in charge" of my flight had ordered the plane boarded. So I called him and was told point blank that my job was to fly the airplane and nothing else. So I told him that when the plane was on the runway ready for takeoff to call me and I'd come out to fly it, hung up, and immediately called the CP. When I stopped by the CP's office after the trip, I was informed that the ramp tower guy was relieved of duty immediately and wouldn't be working there any more.

If there's a problem, you have the senior VP of flight ops phone number and the FAR's - use them if necessary to resolve the problem since that's what they're there for.

Jim

My God, you are so irrelevant.

Those were the good ol' days. Gone, but not forgotten (at least by you.)
 
Yes, Jim. Let's just sit around and wax nostalgic about the good ol' days of the 727.

Who's waxing nostalgic? I was just pointing out that the days of Captain KVar and drawing the electrical system from memory are long gone. The FAA and the airlines, in their infinite wisdom, apparently think that anything that can go wrong can be handled by pushing some buttons or throwing some switches so that's all the monkeys up front need to know (overstatement but not greatly). Yet they leave that captains' authority in there in case it can't.

Jim
 
JIM the son of CAPT KAVAR!

Proudly so. Back in those days you had to have a pretty good understanding of the systems, whether you were the engineer, f/o, or captain. Nowadays, it's too much "well, I pushed the buttons (or moved the switches) like the checklist says but it didn't help - now what do I do." You may enjoy being a trained monkey, but I always liked being a pilot... :lol:

Private pilot day 1 - know thy airplane. To the day I retired, although flying the 737 longer and later, I knew the 727 better than the 737. Thankfully, the two had much in common.

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top