CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 1,920
- Reaction score
- 1,961
Its not too far over your head unless you choose to make it that way. Do you really not see that it only takes one pilot to file a DFR claim? Do you not see Management's position that the Company can be held accountable for collusion with USAPA if a non-NIC list is accepted? Do you not see that the west pilots interests can no longer be legally represented as a group separate from the east-controlled USAPA? Add all this up and there is simply only two possible paths that can be taken; the first path is through the courts as a means of answering the NIC or non-NIC question, or USAPA can accept the NIC and move on. There is no viable third option.I see the problem now. You are just so far over my head, that I just can't comprehend the issues like you can. Where I come from, when there is a dispute, the best course of action is to sit down and attempt to find the middle ground. I know, I know, we can't have any of that, can we?
So, if I understand you, the BEST course of action is to withdraw from all litigation, and BOHICA. Lets have the NIC AND LOA93 since it's obvious to me the company is in no hurry for a contract. Make us pay. I get that!
Thanks for the advise!
Driver B)
The RLA does not permit the west and east pilots to work towards a newly-crafted compromise at this point because they certified USAPA as the new bargaining agent and then required USAPA to abide by the statutory DFR provisions. If a single pilot, east or west, brings a DFR claim against USAPA for not using the NIC, then the entire compromise deal between 99.99% of all US pilots will not mean anything and a ratification vote could very well be halted by an injunction. You may not accept this as fact, but Management does and they will not expose the shareholders to a collusion lawsuit by knowingly violating the terms of the TA. Thus, my position is the same - this dispute is past the negotiation phase. Its the NIC in section 22 or a final and definitive solution crafted by the court. Nothing else will resolve the matter.
