P-I-D. The date of the merger is the important part here. Not what has happened AFTER the merger. Why is it so hard for you east guys to understand that. PRE merger. POST merger.
1700 east furloughed pilots. They all want to leapfrog over active west pilots.
Except to Mr Nicolau, it seems. From the opinion and award:
"In the exercise of caution, we have also constructed the list on a
no-growth basis, using the fleet as it existed on January 1, 2007, and
giving no weight to pre-merger orders except to the extent that any
such additions were in place as of January 1, 2007. Our judgment as to
the fleet is based, not on asserted expectations as both sides urged,
but on reality. Particularly in this day and age, with airline instability a
way of life, it makes little sense to rely on pre-merger projections. This
is especially the case here when the financial picture of both airlines
was less than optimum. A January 1, 2007 list also is a closer
reflection of reality on the merged airline."
He just used PID for status, not fleet. So it was okay to use pre merger for status, post merger for "a closer
reflection of reality on the merged airline" fleet, where the east had dropped what, twice as many A/C as the west yet still recalled about 300 pilots?