Yet here you are... part of the show. Part of that "bunch of idiots".
A post I can agree with. SH, you don't have to read it.
Yet here you are... part of the show. Part of that "bunch of idiots".
Where is our favorite flame baitor Move2CLT? It's no fun with out his infinite wisdom here. 🙁
What would you have them put out for a vote, the Kirby? Parker has said there will be no contract until the SLI is finally settled in court.
Yeah. Hard to believe that you were there last night. You would have stood out like a sore thumb and I personally would have thrown you to the curb.There will never be a joint contract. Even Move2Clt, if he could appear, would agree. He told me so at the fundraiser last night.
I don't know you nor do I want to. Binding arbitration is an arm of the court yet you crapped on that pretty well.You? So, you mean me? Do you know me? As PHX said, what court decision have I ignored?
The court will decide. Wait and see.I think the key words there are "for use". The company has accepted the Nic. The question is does it have to be used? Can it be changed? Either Parker or Kirby said just that.
Maybe m2c is moving back to PHX and its impossible for his fingers to admit that he going to be in PHX.... for a long, long time.
Maybe he's sharing a room with DP.
Maybe he's still hugging the great white bowl.
Maybe he's come to his sense's and now is backing DOH.
Maybe " da wife" won't let him out tonight.
Who cares al long as he is not here.
Move, we see you lurking come play with us!!!!!!
http://worldclown.com/
Injunction
Nope- there you are wrong. The first joint contract is very different and must meet a standard different from that of subsequent negotiations.Section 22 of the CBA is negotiable EVERY time you enter negotiations. It's NO different than any other section of the Contract when you enter negotiations. It's NEGOTIATED as is EVERY other section of the CBA. A Judge who KNOWS the RLA will NOT interfere with NEGOTIATIONS. The Nic WAS a bargaining position under ALPA........NOT with USAPA.
NLG out.
If our union accepts Nic and puts a proposal forward it could be voted on. The SLI does not need to be settled in court. it just needs to be settled.What would you have them put out for a vote, the Kirby? Parker has said there will be no contract until the SLI is finally settled in court.
What do you consider "resonable"? The Kirby? Is min fleet a must? Industry standard pay? Vacation? And how do we go about getting "reasonable" when the company shows no interest, and again has said, no contract will happen until we get an answer to the SLI?
Cleary has thrown his co-workers under the bus by forcing them to accept his fear mongering in lieu of better pay and benefits.Come on son what is your seniority, man up!!!!! are you throwing your co-workers under the bus? A lot of the junoir guys thank me for supporting them, I'm a team player. USAPA is going to get some money back that ALPA gave away, hope you thank them.
If our union accepts Nic and puts a proposal forward it could be voted on. The SLI does not need to be settled in court. it just needs to be settled.
I've been over this already.
A contract needs to be looked at as a whole. Everyone can pick things they don't like and complain about it. For me it's a total package and the devil is in the details. I've listed some specifics in a previous post. Look it up if you actually care to know.