Typical WEST mentallity the title of the articlle is, written by,,,,,,Arbitration agreements aren't always binding!
If you follow my posts at all you would know that I very quickly and at least somewhat humbly acknowledge when I have made an error or misstatement that is caught by another poster. It happened last night in fact on a different thread where I posted ERISA information about fiduciary responsibilities for a pension plan instead of the medical insurance plan. As soon as the error was pointed out I went back and posted the correct excerpt from the DOL website. My facts were still correct, but I posted the wrong section of the ERISA Q&A and fixed it within an hour of the original post. So, when I'm wrong I accept it and try to make things right going forward.Reading palms too??? You sure seem to know a lot about what people will and will not do. Mind reader, sooth sayer...what other talents do you have?
Driver B)
bean counter,
thanks for 1st reasonable west statement I've read in way too long!
I think the relative junior at both pre merged groups stand to gain or lose the most on any final decision. We all know the Nic east-west opinions. Keep in mind that I expect my current cba to fairly represent the East junior as well as the west junior. IMO if Nic was implemented by Usapa then the junior east have an equally valid argument with Dfr. So round and round we go!
Therefore, I as well hope the 2 never integrate and let the chips fall where they may.
fa
Wow! Not even close.. IMO if Nic was implemented by Usapa then the junior east have an equally valid argument with Dfr.
Now I have stated against many other west posters opinions that Silver will take option 1 and declare a non-NIC list to be a DFR. If I'm proven right then my track record will be nearly spotless on all of this. If not, then I will have my first major blemish in making logical conclusions about these matters of fact and law. I'm okay if it doesn't turn out the way I believe, but I call them like I see them and this is what I expect to be the most likely outcome. Feel free to come back and congratulate me if I'm proven right or rake me over the coals if I got this one wrong.
It's not in the cards for me to be there but I will be looking forward to reading what all goes on as soon as it becomes available.Are you going to the courtroom on Dec. 1st Calloway?
You're going to sue USAPA because it Implemented a federally arbitrated list? That's your argument?
Move, you know better. There was no "federal arbitration" going on with the Nic. It was a hired gun employed by our old and long gone bargaining agent in a failed and dead process. If you want to see Federal Arbitration, look to our loss on LOA 93. Then you will see REAL final and binding. There will be no lawsuits or court arguments going forward after the award, barring graft or something similar.
Since my time to participate here is getting more and more limited (political workload is growing) I will address a couple of other recurring items out of context to your post.
As to the initial RICO, the sending of feces, not paying dues/fees, and blocking of the telephones had to stop. Darn near shut the organization down. I have no comment on the follow up actions, other than to say one charged party avoided the whole matter by a simple statement of regret that he was "involved." Nothing really public, nothing more required. Those get helped that help themselves. His biggest problem was dealing with the other morons (who also had to answer to their family about stupid prank acts and legal bills) Apparently he was persona non grata for a while..even lying to his pals about what he did to sidestep the suit(s).
You were correct in pointing out Judge Silver's regret at being saddled with the DJ. After all, where was the Company with all this early on in Addington?..they had an opening. I don't get all the hoopla on the upcoming hearing. My understanding it is a case scheduling meeting. Not even an outhouse lawyer, but won't they just be setting guidelines for testimony/depositions, evidence, court dates, and the like? Based on the Addington schedule, seems like a real bench trial is late Spring. I am asking you, not sure.
RR
I'm curious as to why the alleged feces was never mentioned in the suit. Or was it?
And you know this how? Was it sent by a west pilot or an east pilot pretending to be someone else. You guys do play that game after all.Never said it was. But it happend.
RR
And you know this how? Was it sent by a west pilot or an east pilot pretending to be someone else. You guys do play that game after all.
And why wouldn't something like that be submitted?
Move, you know better. There was no "federal arbitration" going on with the Nic. It was a hired gun employed by our old and long gone bargaining agent in a failed and dead process. If you want to see Federal Arbitration, look to our loss on LOA 93. Then you will see REAL final and binding. There will be no lawsuits or court arguments going forward after the award, barring graft or something similar.
RR
Why evidence like this was saved is curious. You'd think thisnisnthe first thing they'd show the judge.My edit passed your post.
You and the Kannapolis NC Postal inspector can have that discussion over beers someday, if you want. It is a good story with protected evidence that just might be told someday, if necessary. Obviously not in a PHX courtroom.
RR
You and the Kannapolis NC Postal inspector can have that discussion over beers someday, if you want. It is a good story with protected evidence that just might be told someday, if necessary.
This is getting good...
Mail to a Charlotte address, a city with it's own Postal Inspector's Office, that involves the Kannapolis Postal Inspector - perhaps mailed from Kannapolis???
"Protected evidence" with a USPS official to testify - but not included in the charges filed with the court (but posting on a webboard was included as a "crime"...).
This seems to be painting a picture of something...maybe that the story contains more feces than the mailing...
Jim