What's new

US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh I get it. Sooooo, you're saying that to "elicit peace" we need to all dig deep in our wallets for our hard earned cash and simply give it all to the many misanthropic hoard that camps out on Wall Street...RIGHT?

So we don't do the right thing, the ethical thing or the legal thing. We simple pander to the larger group (and attempt to bribe the smaller group) to get general "labor peace". I guess we'll just see what justice is delivered.


CB
That is not what I was saying at all - I was saying that Silver was indirectly telling the company ( Mr Siegel) in the previous court meeting that she was alluding that the company should compensate the pilots better (ie. pay) in exchange for the pilots to accept the Nic sli. In other words pay the pilots more to ensure that the Nic survives a vote. Comprendo?
 
CB
That is not what I was saying at all - I was saying that Silver was indirectly telling the company ( Mr Siegel) in the previous court meeting that she was alluding that the company should compensate the pilots better (ie. pay) in exchange for the pilots to accept the Nic sli. In other words pay the pilots more to ensure that the Nic survives a vote. Comprendo?
You figure that out all by yourself or from reading the more than 100 posts that have already covered it?
 
You figure that out all by yourself or from reading the more than 100 posts that have already covered it?


I'm posting it again to help you understand it uhaul. It takes a lot to get through that thick skull of yours. I can provide you a tutor to help you more in the future if you like.

What is "they" company up to today? :lol:
 
Quick in the trigger tonight, eh boo boo?


That should be:

Quick on the trigger tonight, eh boo boo?

Oh master of the English language.

Why dont you get the great pumpkin ( BoingBoy ) to help you out, he likes you westies.
 
That should be:

Quick on the trigger tonight, eh boo boo?

Oh master of the English language.

Why dont you get the great pumpkin ( BoingBoy ) to help you out, he likes you westies.
What the matter boo boo? Seem a bit on edge today.

I'm hoping to make you feel a bit more comfortable with sum grammatical shortfalls as you've still not been able to figure out the difference between lose and loose.

And, btw, bringing up topics already discussed 100 times over to make yourself appear intelligent is pretty lame.
 
Surprising considering you think LOA 93 is not so bad.
LOA 93 will not make a difference to me, its for the pilots that you and the rest of the west are trying to screw out of their rightful DOH positions. Remember you will soon be the lowest paid pilots in the industry. OH thats right your still out on the street looking for a LTRSP.
 
LOA 93 will not make a difference to me, its for the pilots that you and the rest of the west are trying to screw out of their rightful DOH positions. Remember you will soon be the lowest paid pilots in the industry. OH thats right your still out on the street looking for a LTRSP.
Soon be the lowest paid pilots in the industry?

Who are the lowest paid pilots now?

:lol: :lol:
 
Ok, back on topic.

Some useful info the east may want to continue ignoring. This is the exact same info Leonidas put out that was quickly debunked by USAPA. Apparently, USAPA did a bit of research and found Leonidas' numbers to be correct.

Imagine that.


Well, the NAC just published the Jan 2011 over-60 list. There are 542 total pilots over 60. 126 (23%) of those are FOs (141 or 26% if you include the E190 Captains which is really an FO position). That's 542 pilots who will not benefit from attrition, because they are the attrition.
 
You are the looser and I have lost interest. Hows that?

No apology needed. :lol:
He Is a LOOZZer... and he does not like my spelling of Loooooozer...! He does not get the PUN...! LOL
but then again he is a LOOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZer! Can not wait for him to move to CLT can you???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top