Ok clear, I'm going to take your word for all of this, but I have a question. The USAPA leaders say that the east scope and CofC provisions are much better than the west. If this is true, how will we "pay" to keep them? Should we?
If we were to take your contract, and our contract side by side and cherry pick the best of both there probably would be a billion dollar bill attached to it and I think we can agree that it won't fly. Take disability. I heard from one of your guys that should know that the ideal would be your short term and our long term. Sounds nice, but expensive. Something will have to give. Because of our sick and disability system I have worked to save about a years worth of sick leave. That's a hundred grand plus earned. A west friend of mine has about 30 hrs because he says he doesn't need it. So he has sick vacationed a lot while I didn't. Do I give that up? Does he get left hanging as he enters his 50's? Again, something has to give.
On one issue I will side with the west. We should have had west negotiators on the NAC all the time.
On the scheduling question, USAPA said at the CLT meeting that they accepted PBS. What are the other issues you are looking at there?