cactusboy53
Veteran
- Joined
- May 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,649
- Reaction score
- 7,407
CactusBoy53,
I understand your thoughts and they make sense. However, as a person who has endured the east UEL union actions who has been at the forefront of combating what I believe have been toxic east union activity I have a good sense of how this election will unfold. I know virtually all of the east candidates, I know their tactics, and I understand the sentiment of the different factions of the pilot group.
In my opinion, the best way out of this quagmire to prevent a split vote is to build consensus around a candidate who does not have a dog in the SLI fight and does not carry political baggage. If not, I suspect the east will use its voting majority to install east candidates to USAPA officer positions until after the SLI dispute is complete.
USA320Pilot
Well, I hope you are wrong. This is again squarely on the shoulders of the voters. Realistically the SLI "fight" is over. It's been over since April 2007. What has transpired since then is merely delay. As such all nominees have "no dog in the SLI fight".
The East voter has to ask these questions:
1. Having read all the transcripts that are available to me, is there ANY WAY that we can ultimately evade the Nicolau Seniority List?
2. If the answer to Q1 is NO; How much more money, 401K contributions, vacation time, time off and other contract improvements am I willing to deny myself for what little further delay there is?
3. Does the candidate have any documented leadership experience? In those experiences can the candidate demonstrate a record of success? Does the candidate have any union experience? Does the candidate have any experience with the USAPA inner workings?
I think it's going to be VERY interesting to see what CLT/PHL/DCA pilots decide to stay in the race (besides Andy).
VOTING DECISION: Do I vote educated & logically based on fact or do I vote emotionally based on angst & desperation?