Seems to me that this election will closely resemble the representational election of 2008, at least as far as the principle issue is concerned. Yes there are issues about governance, leadership style, the union's relationship with other entities such as management and other labor groups, etc. But the overriding issue is still the NIC. Should we continue to fight or delay it, or begin to accept it.
What goes on in the courts can be prolonged for a number of additional years, thus extending the virtual fence between east and west, aka separate operations.
If the majority still feels that is the best way then so be it. But the cost is LOA93. So lets stop bitching about bottom of the barrel pay and a lack of an industry standard contract.
Provided we remain a stand alone carrier, those over the age of about 55 will spend most of their remaining (actuarial) years on LOA93. For those over about 59 - this is as good as it gets. The cost of delaying the NIC is LOA93, end of story.
If some court ever throws the NIC out, I will eat collard greens for a straight week, no seasoning.
KV