What about the "grocery store" line the west pilots were standing in before the east came along? The west was standing in an efficient line that was moving and had no one standing outside the store just waiting for a chance to get in. By contrast the east was standing in a crowded, inefficient grocery store line that was moving people through the queue at a snails pace compared to every other grocery store in the country. For every two people in line inside the east grocery store there was another person who wanted to come in to buy groceries but the supply of food was dwindling or spoiled with no supply trucks lined up to restock the shelves.
Then one day the managers of the two stores, the west one that was running efficiently with stocked shelves and no one waiting outside to get in and the east one that was inefficient, running severe shortages and with people standing outside to get in line, decided they would merge and combine the operations and customers of both stores. They told the customers that they could decide on their own how to best get in line at the new, bigger store with fully stocked shelves so that everyone could benefit from the merger. After some time and with no real resolution, the representatives from both groups of customers decided to let a neutral, third-party arbitrator decide how to integrate their ranks. The arbitrator made his final and binding and fully legal decision on the integration and then the east customers decided that they didn't want to integrate with the group from the west after all. Despite the arbitrator's ruling, they wanted virtually all of the west customers to get in line behind them at the new store, especially since the new store was now fully stocked and everyone who was previously prevented from coming in the east grocery store was now inside and enjoying the benefits of the merger orchestrated by Management.
You guys who make these kinds of cutting the line analogies fail to recognize that the west pilots did not join in to the east pilot's line or visa-versa. Both groups will have to get into an entirely new line based on an objective, fair, independent and fully enforceable binding arbitration agreement. It is not the east line anymore and nothing USAPA does will change that fact when a new JCBA is put out for ratification. And since USAPA has a federally-mandated responsibility to negotiate, there will be a ratification vote in the future despite all failed attempts to stop it.
Rememberwhat I said about reading comprehension? Now read my post over and try again. You have been had and dont even realize it.
