oldiebutgoody
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2002
- Messages
- 2,627
- Reaction score
- 945
No, because ALPA separated the expense numbers from the salary numbers. Those numbers you see published have a column for the "benefits and other compensation". Here's an example:I suggest that you point your poison at the ALPA shill that posted the ALPA leadership numbers. I know what you are talking about and I also know that someone would make that point. But you did not make that point about the ALPA numbers did you?
Is the same thing also not true about the ALPA numbers? Except they have 60,000 members to take care of not 4000.
http://www.unionfacts.com/unions/unionOfficers.cfm?id=419570
See the difference yet? Those total compensation numbers for the two you list are only a little more than the "benefits and other compensation" of the top ALPA guys. And, those are the "boiler plate" guys, the ones that don't even do anything but play golf with senators and congressmnen and stuff. The MECs are still below them, collecting similar amounts.
USAPA is WAAAY more cost effective than ALPA. Best money we EVER spent.